Advanced Search Results
Sooppy Haji Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-16-2008
Sales Tax/VAT
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 10; Central Excise Act
2008(2)KLJ925; (2009)19VST427(Ker)
Muhammed Rafiq, GP
ORDERH.L. Dattu, C.J.1. The question for consideration is, whether 'Deluxe Janatha Cem' sold by the assessee is a lime product classifiable as an item falling under Entry 74 of First Schedule to the Kerala General Sales...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYeses International Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Sep-23-2008
Sales Tax/VAT
Central Sales Tax Act, 1965; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 41 and 45A and ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19
2008(3)KLJ514; (2009)23VST130(Ker)
Muhammed Rafiq, Sr. GP
ORDERH.L. Dattu, C.J.1. Both these revision petitions pertain to the assessment year 1996-97.2. S.T.Rev. No. 136/2005 is filed questioning the correctness or otherwise of the order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in T.A. No.694...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan Pharmacy Council, Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Dec-08-2000
Service
Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 22 and 26; General Clauses Act, 1997; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16
2001(1)WLC722; 2001(2)WLN434
M. Rafiq, Additional Advocate General
ORDERYadav, J.(1). The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, Rajasthan Pharmacy Council through its president, Sri Ramesh Ojha, which is a body corporate within the meaning of Section 22 of the Pharmacy Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bharat Bhushan Basotia Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Oct-19-2005
Service
Bihar Reservation of Vacancies in Posts and Services (for SC/ST and OBC) Act, 1991 - Sections 4; Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 1955 - Rules 9, 9(1), 9(3) and 20; Rajasthan Various Services (Amendment) Rules, 2002; Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16(1), 16(4), 16(4A), 16(4B), 233, 234, 238 and 309
RLW2006(1)Raj329; 2006(2)WLC83
Mohd. Rafiq, AAG
K.S. Rathore, J.1. Since all the aforesaid writ petitions involve common question of law, therefore, these four writ petitions are being decided by this common judgment. The facts of the case of Bharat Bhushan Basotia v....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Pareek (Dr.) and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
May-31-2004
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 33
RLW2004(4)Raj2673; 2004(3)WLC577
Mohd. Rafiq, AAG and; A.K. Sharma and; Mukesh Kumar Meen
K.S. Rathore, J.1. These are four writ petitions and at the request of the respective parties all the writ petitions are heard together and being disposed of by a common order. The facts of the case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarju Singh and ors. Vs. Bijai Bahadur Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-15-1926
Civil
AIR1927All254; 101Ind.Cas.287
Walsh, Ag. C.J.1. In our opinion, the Judge's order is technically right according to the strict view of the law. Although in practice the Collector and his sale officers may sometimes take another view, fruit trees...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Roop Narayan and Etc.
Rajasthan
Jan-24-1997
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 64 and 65; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 114
1999ACJ413; AIR1997Raj123
P.C. Gupta and; A.K. Sharma, Advs.
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J. 1. The core question which arises for consideration in all these 19 appeals is as to whether consignment booked under a 'said to contain' railway receipt, amounts to admission on the part...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPappi @ Mehboob and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jan-03-2008
Criminal
RLW2008(2)Raj1608
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Four appellants viz. Pappi @ Mehboob, Lalit Kumar Singh @ Gyani, Hemu @ Hemant and Laxman were the accused on the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2 Kota....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Roop Narayan and 19 ors.
Rajasthan
Jan-24-1997
Civil
1997(2)WLC455; 1997(1)WLN339
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The core question which arise for consideration in all these 19 deceaseds to whether consignment booked under a 'suit to contain' railway receipt, amounts to admission on the part of the railway...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector, Treasury and Accounts Vs. Suresh Chand and ors.
Rajasthan
Jul-28-2003
Service
Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinate and Ministerial) Service Rules, 1969; Rajasthan Municipal Service Rules, 1963 - Rule 7
RLW2004(2)Raj861
Subhash Jain, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and; Brij Kishore Sharma, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
S.K. Keshote, J.1. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to filing of this revision petition under Section 115 of the C.P.C. are that the plaintiff respondent No. 1 filed a civil suit along with the application...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »