Advanced Search Results
M. Radhakrishnan Vs. the District Educational Officer and ors.
Chennai
Mar-29-1996
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34
1997(1)CTC133; (1996)IIMLJ464
R. Swaminathan, A.G.P.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. The plaintiff in O.S.No. 129 of 1979 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Palani is the appellant in the above second appeal. He filed the suit for declaration declaring that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskY-46, Sarel Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank Ltd. Rep. by Its Sp ...
Chennai
Jun-15-2007
Labour and Industrial
Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 41(2); Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2A and 11A; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2007(115)FLR400]; (2007)IIILLJ221Mad
V. Chellammal, Spl. Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 1 and ;G.R. Swaminathan, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. The petitioner is a Co-operative Society. Aggrieved by the order of the first respondent-appellate authority dated October 25, 2004 under the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, in having allowed the appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuguna Poultry Farm Limited, Vs. Arul Mariamman Textiles Limited, Rep. ...
Chennai
Jul-28-2004
Civil
Tamil Nadu Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act - Sections 27; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 16; ;Constitution of India - Article 227
AIR2005Mad72; 2004(4)CTC197; (2004)4MLJ39
G.R. Swaminathan, Adv.
ORDERM. Thanikachalam, J. 1. Both the revisions petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, after obtaining the leave of this Court by the revision petitioners, since they are not parties to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Vs. M.Siv ...
Chennai
Jul-23-2010
Land Acquisition
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 54
Ms.Shanmuga Priya; Mr.R.Swaminathan, Advs.
1. Heard the arguments of Mr.V.Ravi, learned Special Government Pleader (AS), Ms.Shanmuga Priya for Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 4 in A.S.No.1209 of 2001, Mr.R.Swaminathan, learned counsel for first respondent in A.S.No.1210 of 2001...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs.Sri Krishna Constructions. Vs. Ms.Tiffin's Barytes
Chennai
Jul-02-2012
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 433[e], 494[1][a], 439[1][b],; Companies [Court] Rules, 1959 - Rule 9 ; O.S. Rules - Order 36, Rule 11; Letters Patent Act - Clause 15
Mr.G.R.Swaminathan, Adv.
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Order XXXVI, Rule 11 of O.S. Rules, r/w. Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the judgment and order dated 30.3.2012 made in C.A.No.1911 of 2010 in C.P.No.326 of 2010.J U D...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanipet Greaves Employees Union, Represented by Its General Secretary ...
Chennai
Sep-05-2003
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 226
(2004)IILLJ622Mad
G. Kavitha, Govt. Adv. for Respondents 1 and 2 and G.R. Swaminathan, Adv. For Respondents 3 and 4
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. By consent of all parties main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. Ranipet Greaves Employees Union and Greaves Labour Union have filed the above writ petition questioning the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Sudakar Vs. the District Registrar (Societies) and ors.
Chennai
Jul-03-2009
Trusts and Societies
Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 - Sections 14, 15, 36 and 53
(2009)8MLJ1523
G.R. Swaminathan, Adv. for Respondents 3 and 4 in W.P. (MD) No. 3414/09, in W.P.(MD) No. 3657/2009 for R5 and 6 in W.P. (MD) No. 4269/09 for R4, ;Pala Ramasamy, Special Govt. Pleader for Respondents 1
ORDERR.S. Ramanathan, J.1. The three writ petitions were filed by the same person seeking different reliefs against the District Registrar (Societies), Virudhunagar District, to take action in respect of various acts and omissions committed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Sundara Rajan Vs. State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police and
Chennai
Apr-30-2010
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 103, 109, 405, 406, 409, 420, 468 and 471
J.C. Durairaj, Government Adv. for R-1 (Crl. Side) and; G.R. Swaminathan, Adv. for R-2
ORDERC.T. Selvam, J.1. This petitioner, who is the accused in case pending in C.C. No. 132 of 2006 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu, seeks to quash the proceedings against him. A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and ors. Vs. M. Suryanarayana Rao
Supreme Court of India
Aug-07-1998
Service
AIR1998SC2992; JT1998(5)SC448; 1998LabIC3036; 1998(4)SCALE501; (1998)6SCC400; [1998]3SCR1060; 1999(2)SLJ79(SC)
Srinivasan, J.1. Leave granted.The respondent herein applied before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad for quashing an order of the Government rejecting his representation for stepping up his pay to be on par with the pay of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovt. of A.P. and Another Vs. N. Gangaiah
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-06-2001
Service
Fundamental Rules - Rule 22-B; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19
2001(2)ALD106; 2001(2)ALT293
Mr. K.G. Krishna Murthy, Adv.
ORDERS.B. Sinha, CJ.1. This wit petition is directed against the order dated 25-6-1999 passed in OA No.7378 of 1997 by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal.2. The respondent was the applicant before the Tribunal. He filed an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »