Advanced Search Results

Surender Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

CRA No.118-SB of 2000 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of Decision: February 15, 2013 (1)CRA No.118-SB of 2000(O&M) Surender ---Appellant versus The State of Haryana ---Respondent (2)CRA No.122-SB of...

State Vs. Bhupinder Singh Bisht and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h MARCH, 2015 DECIDED ON :15. h MAY, 2015 + CRL.REV.P. 162/2014 & Crl.M.A.4214/2014 STATE ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Atul Kumar Shrivastava, SPP....

Uoi vs.r.s.yadav

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

$~25 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 8345/2011 UOI R.S.YADAV Through Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Through Mr....

Ashok Tripathi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R.S.Yadav

W.P.No.14846/2007 31.08.2012 Shri A.D.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Ms.D.K.Bohre, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents No.1 to 5. Shri R.S.Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents No.6 and 7. The claim is made for payment of salary...

Argued By:- Mr. D.S. Bali Senior Advocate with Vs. Om Parkash. ....... ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

CRA-S-2558-SB of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-2558-SB of 2006. Decided on:-May 15th, 2014. Om Parkash.........Appellant. Versus State of Haryana.........Respondent. CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon. ***** Argued...

Gopal Sanodiya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R.S.Yadav

W.P.No.13134/2006 20.08.2013 Shri Saket Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rahul jain, learned Deputy Advocate General with Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents No.1 to 3. Shri R.S.Yadav, learned counsel for the...

Ravindra Nath Awasthi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2009(85)AWC2090

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri T.P. Singh, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Siddharth Nandan for the petitioner and Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents No. 1 to 4.2. Affidavits have been...

Ashok Kumar Tripathi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1181

ORDERVineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner was a fair price shop licence holder. By means of an order dated 2.7.2005, passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Lalganj, district Pratapgarh his licence was cancelled. The appeal filed by the...

Prakashak, Madhu Prakashan Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(25)PTC746(All)

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Gupta, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. Respondent No. 3 filed suit for permanent injunction in a representative capacity under Order 1 Rule 8, CPC. The suit was decreed by the trial Court on 11.1.1998. The defendants in suit filed...

Smt. Pratibha Yadav, anr and. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Adv.

1- As the question involved in both these petitions are common and challenge is made to an order-dated 29.8.08, passed by the Commissioner Sagar Division, pertaining to appointment of Panchayat Karmi to Gram Panchayat Kishanpura under...