Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r s puri · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.105 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 01 1996

Overseas Chinese Cuisine (India) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-01-1996

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. These are cross-appeals-three by the assessee and three by the Department in respect of the assessment years 1988-89 to 1990-91, which arise out of a consolidated order dated November 29, 1991, by the Commissioner of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1996

Overseas Chinese Cuisine Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-01-1996

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)56ITD67(Mum.)

1. These are cross-appeals - 3 by the assessee and 3 by the Department in respect of the assessment years 1988-89 to 1990-91, which arise out of a consolidated order dated 29th November, 1991 by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2006

Municipal Council, Sujanpur Vs. Surinder Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(S), 10(1), 11A and 25F; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41 and 106; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 16

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR198]; [2006(3)JCR106(SC)]; (2006)IILLJ768SC; 2006(5)SCALE505; (2006)5SCC173; 2007(1)SLJ6(SC); 2006(1)LC761(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Verma, ; R.K. Kapoor and ; Anis Ahmed Khan, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant herein being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 29.4.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 21 2000

Krishan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : 2000(54)DRJ675

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Puri, Adv.

A.K. Sikri, J.1. The principle question which needs determination in-this case is as to whetherEAN-INDIA is a 'State' or 'another authority' within the meaning of Article 12 ofConstitution of India amenable to the writ jurisdiction of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2013

Present Mr. Amar Singh Sandhu Advocate Vs. R.S.Puri

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

R.S.A.No.2822 o”1. .IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.2822 of 2013 [O&M].Date of Decision: July 22nd, 2013 Jaspal Singh ...Appellant Versus R.S.Puri ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK 1 Whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial