Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r r biswas · Page 1 of about 23 results (0.083 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 15 2004

Md. Kamal Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-15-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 302 and 379; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313; ;Evidence Act - Section 145

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN81

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Biswas and ;Sofia Begam, Advs.

Arun Kumar Bhattacharya, J.1. The hearing stems from an appeal preferred against the judgement and order of conviction and sentence passed by the ld. Sessions Judge, 2nd Bench, City Sessions Court, Calcutta in S.C. No. 11/1989...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2008

Sanat Panja and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-01-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 113A and 113B; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B, 304B(2) and 306

Reported in : 2009CriLJ407

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Biswas and ;Ratna Ghosh, Advs.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. Sanat Panja resident of village Jash Dighi under Indus Police Station in the District of Bankura married Smt. Puspanjali Panja on 18th Jaistha, 1393 B.S. Puspanjali gave birth to a male child...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2004

Haren Deoghoria Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-23-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 304(2); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164 and 463

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN635

Advocate for Respondent : Biplab Mitra and ;Amajit De, Advs.

G. C. De, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of eviction dated 14.8.96 and sentence dated 19.8.96 in Sessions Case No. 40 of 1995 (Sessions Trial No. 5 of 96) passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 06 2005

Md. Aftab Alam Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-06-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32, 302, 304B, 307 and 498A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Reported in : (2006)1CALLT531(HC),2005(4)CHN794,I(2006)DMC870

Advocate for Respondent : Samir Chatterjee and ;Joy Sengupta, Advs.

Arun Kumar Bhattacharya, J. 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Id. Additional Sessions Judge, 13th Court, 24-Pgs (S), Alipore in Sessions Trial No. 1(2)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2006

Sk. Mithun @ Md. Kalim, Sanjoy Khan @ Sanjaia (In Jail) Vs. State of W ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-16-2006

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21 and 50

Reported in : 2006(2)CHN603

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Biswas and ;S. Sultana, Advs.

Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by two appellants from jail challenging their conviction under Section 21 of the NDPS Act and the consequential sentence order recorded by the ld. Additional Sessions Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2008

Madhusudan Sarkar and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-08-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 32, 113A and 134; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 305, 306 and 498A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4389

Advocate for Respondent : Amajit Dey and ;R.R. Biswas, Advs.

Tapas Kumar Giri, J.1. The appellants/accused of this case are challenging the judgment passed by the Learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Kalna in Sessions Case No. 59 of 1989 convicting the appellants/ accused under Section 498-A/306, IPC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2004

K. Ganesh Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-08-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 409; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1C) and 5(2); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 313

Reported in : (2004)2CALLT85(HC),2004(3)CHN78

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Biswas, Adv.

Asit Kumar Bisi, J. 1. This appeal is by the appellant and it arises out of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by Sri A.B. Mukherjee the learned Judge, Second Special Court, Alipore,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2007

Sheikh Habal and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-26-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302 and 304; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Reported in : (2007)3CALLT342(HC),2007CriLJ3971

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Biswas and ;P. Satpathi, Advs.

Girish Chandra Gupta, J.1. The accused Sk. Habal, Sk. Kalo, Sk, Aijamal and Sheikh Bodir all sons of late Sk. Golam of Budhpur within Khoirashol Police Station in the district of Birbhum were charge-sheeted by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1995

Rabindra Nath Moorty Naidu Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-19-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 307; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 6; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : (1996)1CALLT297(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Biswas, Adv.

Ram Prakash Gupta, J.1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 26th March, 1984 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Durgapur in Sessions Case No. 3/83, whereby the appellant was convicted for offence under Section 307 I.P.C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1991

Jagannath Das Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-01-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 386 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 84 and 299; ;Evidence Act - Section 105

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT411(HC),95CWN1163

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Das and ;R.R. Biswas Advs.

Mukul Gopal Mukherji, J.1. We have exhaustively dealt with the facts of the present case in our judgment dt. 17.7.89 which may be treated as a part of the present judgment too. The appellant was found...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial