Advanced Search Results

Sushila Industries and ors. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Orissa

Subject : Direct TaxationCompany

Acts : Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 277 and 278B; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 68; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 10; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23C

Reported in : 70(1990)CLT142; [1992]75CompCas704(Orissa); [1992]198ITR332(Orissa)

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel and ;M.R. Patnaik, Adv.

V. Gopalaswamy, J. 1. This revision is preferred for setting aside the order dated October 30, 1989, of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cuttack, Camp at Rourkela, in Case II(c) C. C. No. 17 of...

Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100A; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2006(II)OLR609

Advocate for Respondent : Addl. Government Adv.,; S.R. Patnaik,; L. Mishra,;

M.M. Das, J. 1. This is an appeal under the Letters Paten'; against the order dated 20.5.2005 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W. P. (C) No. 2884 of 2005 which was...

Janaki Ballav Patnaik Vs. Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 153B; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 327

Reported in : AIR1989Ori216

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohanty, Adv. (for Nos. 1, 2 and 3) and ;R. Patnaik, Adv. (for No. 4)

K.P. Mohapatra, J.1. In this petition the plaintiff has prayed for the following reliefs :(i) The suit should be tried in camera; and (ii) To prohibit publication of the proceedings of the trial including evidence of...

Satsang a Society Registered Under the Societies Registration Act and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR78]; [2008(2)JCR408(Jhr)]; (2008)IIILLJ639Jhar

M. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.J.1. Prahlad Tiwary, the respondent herein has filed petition in WC Case No. 1 of 2001 before the learned Labour Court. Deoghar claiming compensation as he is entitled to the compensation as a...

Pramod Kumar Mehta and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2063

L.C. Bhadoo, Actg. C.J.1. One of us. Learned Brother (Justice Sunil Kumar Sinha), has referred the following question to be adjudicated by a Larger Bench that is how the matter has been placed before us:Whether a...

Baldeo Sao Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR347(Jhr)]

ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State.2. The instant Revision application has been filed against the judgment dated 22.6.2004, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C., 7th,...

K.P. Bhowmick Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, Ministry ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Administrative Law; Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulation, 1955 - Regulation 5(5)

Reported in : 1986(I)OLR80

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Patra, Addl. Govt. Adv. and ;Standing Counsel (Central)

R.C. Patnaik, J. 1. In this writ application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a member of the Indian Police Service seeks the quashing of the decision of the Government...

irmiah Kujur Vs. the State of Jharkhand,

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner in this writ application has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to consider his case for grant of the benefit of Junior Selection Grade on Graduate...

Smt. Kamla Devi and Smt. Sushila Devi Vs. Mukesh Kumar Chowrasia

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Civil

D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioners in this writ application, have challenged the order of the Sub-Judge-I, Dhanbad passed in Title Suit No. 29 of 2005, whereby the learned court below had...

Arbind Kumar Tiwari Vs. Mahadeb Sen

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR429(Jhr)]

ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the respondent. The suit was filed by the plaintiff-respondent for eviction of the appellant/defendant on the ground of default as well as...