Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r pande · Page 1 of about 22 results (0.056 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 05 2011

Abu Alias Rahuf Arshid Khatri Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-05-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value =...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1955

Jamshed Butt Vs. State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-17-1955

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1957CriLJ382

R. Kaushalendra Rao, J.1. This appeal Is by the plaintiff against the dismissal of his suit on the ground that it was barred by limitation consequent on the findings on the Issues framed as the preliminary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2000

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Nanuram S/O Mohanlal ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-20-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28, 30 and 44; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR193

Advocate for Respondent : Party in person for Respondent No. 1

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Verma, respondent No. 1 in person.2. The petition is directed against the order dated 6-9-1999 passed by the Industrial Court in Revision (U.L.P.)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 2008

Mr. Ramdhari Devnarayan Mishra Vs. Mr.Javid ShrafuddIn and Another

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-04-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Order:- Per Mr. S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member: This appeal is preferred against the order/award dated 30/09/2008 Mr.Javid Shrafuddin and Ors. V/s. Mr. Ramdhari Devnarayan Mishra by Additional District Forum, Thane (Forum below in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2002

Rameshwar Son of Maiya DIn Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-28-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307 to 324

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3437

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A.

ORDERM.C. Jain, J.1. The appellant is Rameshwar who Is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 27-6-1981 passed by Sri R. R. Jatav, the then III Additional Sessions Judge, Hamirpur in S.T. No. 186 of 1980...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2013

Shri Prakash Vs. Shrikant

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : May-30-2013

Subject : MRTP

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Member This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 10.02.2008 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1972

Narbada Prasad Vs. Awadesh Narain

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-30-1972

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 17, Rules 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR1973MP179; 1973MPLJ534

Advocate for Respondent : M. Yunus, Adv.

Shiv Dayal, J.1. This revision is against an order dismissing the defendant's application under Order 9, Rule 13, Civil P. C. in the trial Court, December 17, 1970, was fixed for evidence of the parties. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2001

Stanley Parker Jones Vs. Bansraj Laltaprasad Mishra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : 2001(2)ALLMR551; 2001(3)BomCR263

Advocate for Respondent : Madhukar Suchak, ;A.R. Pande, ;B.P. Pande and S.B. Amin, Advs.

T.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. The learned Advocate for the respondent argued this matter on 1st February, 2001 for some time. Later he prayed for adjourning it on the next day as he desired that the Senior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2005

Smt. Krishna Jaiswal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-02-2005

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 15, 15(2), 19, 28 and 28(3); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 48, 48(2), 87A and 87A(3); Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 14; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 243N, 243ZF, 329A and 329A(4); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978; Uttar Pradesh Zila Panchayat Ke Adhyaksha Ke Avishwas Prastav Ke Sambandh Me Niyam

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1732; 2005(2)ESC879; (2005)2UPLBEC1883

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhir Agarwal, ;J.N. Tiwari, ;Namwar Singh, ;B.D. Pandey, ;R.K. Dubey, ;S.C. Srivastava, ;Sanjeev Kumar Singh, ;Vinod Kumar Singh, ;R. Pande, ;Rakesh Pande, ;Sanjiv Singh, ;C.B. Gupta, ;C.L. Pandey,

1. These two writ petitions deal with the constitutionality as well as interpretation of Section 28 of the U.P. Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1961 (the Act), which provides for motion of no confidence against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2004

Sneh Sadan Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-07-2004

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra and Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2004Bom315

Advocate for Respondent : Y.D. Mulani, A.G.P. for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3, ;A.R. Pande, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and ;R.R. Bhosale, Adv. for Respondent No. 6

ORDERF.I. Rebello, J.1. By the present petition, the petitioner impugns the order of the Revisional Authority dated 26-5-2003 passed in Revision Application No. 244 of 2003. By the said order, the Revisional Authority reversed the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial