Advanced Search Results

Madhav Gansa Wani Deceased Through L.Rs. Pandharinath Hari @ Madhav Wa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(4); Limitation Act - Sections 65; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes And Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste) Certificate Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 4(2)

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR27; 2008(111)BomLR183

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Phatke, Adv.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners impugn judgments rendered by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) in Review Petition No. Rev.Trb.C-4/1989 dated 13.7.1990, judgment and order rendered in Appeal No. Rev.Trb.13/87 dated 26.8.1988 and judgment and...

Shri Sunil S/O Baliram Maddewad Vs. Unknown

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Scheduled Tribe (Regulation of Issuance & Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003 - Rule 2 (1) (f)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri S.K. Kadam And Ors.

01. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties and taken up for final hearing at admission stage itself.02. By the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution...

Dadasaheb S/O Bhausaheb Pathare, Age 53 Years, Vs. the State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 6,

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R.P. Phatke, Adv.

1) Heard.2) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and by consent of the counsel taken up for final hearing.3) The petitioner's land was subjected to acquisition under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. The petitioner contends...

Babasaheb Manik Gunjal and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Produce (Marketing Regulation) Act, 1963 - Sections 7 and 13(1); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 10

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR200

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Phatke, A.G.P., ;C.K. Shinde and ;V.J. Dixit, Advs.

ORDERN.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. Heard Shri Hon, the learned Counsel for the petitioners; Shri Phatke, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, forrespondents Nos. 1 to 3 and 20; Shri Shinde, learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and Shri...

Dilip S/O Narsingrao Yerewad, Aged 36 Years. Vs. the State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R.P. Phatke,; Shri.Pravin S. Patil,Advs.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent.2. By way of present Writ Petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 23092005 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad (hereinafter referred to...

Ashok S/O. Vasantrao Aradhye Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR196

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Phatke, A.G.P. and ;V.J. Dixit, Adv.

ORDERA.D. Mane, J.1. Shri R.M. Borde, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that as per the directions given by this Court, the petitioner has tried to join at Beed but since an incumbent had already resumed...

Kashibai D/O Bhagwan Giri Vs. the State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2003(3)MhLj658

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Phatke, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and ;A.D. Kasliwal, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

V.K. Tahilramani, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitionerand the learned Counsel for the respective respondents.2. The present writ petition is directedagainst the order dated 01.05.2001 terminating theservices of the petitioner with effect from 01.06.2001.The...

Laxmibai W/O Vijayrao Darpel Vs. the Returning Officer, Kopargaon, Nag ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Election Rules, 1966 - Rule 15; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4

Reported in : 1998(4)BomCR800; 1999(1)MhLj486

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Phatke, A.G.P.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J. 1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. 2. Mr. Phatake, learned A.G.P. waives service for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 A. As regards other respondents, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief against...

Shri. Vasant S/O Rangnath Chorghade, Age36 Years, Vs. the State of Mah ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 340; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 192; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Section 157, 189; Constitution of India - Article 12

Advocate for Respondent : Shri.R.P. Phatke,;Shri.E.P. Sawant;Shri. M.P. Kale,;Shri. R.N. Dhorde,;Shri. Sanjay Mundhe,Advs.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.2. The Petitioner in Writ Petition No.7312 of 2008 prayed for directions to Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to declare election programme for holding election of Respondent No.6 Gangakhed Taluka Sahakari...

Prakash Bhaurao Parmeshwar, Age 40 Years, Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri R.P.Phatke; Smt. Manjusha A; Deshpande; Shri R.N.Dhord; Shri N.T.Tribhuwan; Shri S.S.Dambe, Advs.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission.1 By the present petition, filed under Article 226...