Advanced Search Results
Smt. Parmeshwari Devi (Now Deceased) Through Lrs Vs. Shri Dalbir Singh ...
Delhi
Nov-26-2012
Land Acquisition
Mr. R.P.Pandey
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C.REV. 238/2012 Date of Decision:26. 11.2012 SMT. PARMESHWARI DEVI (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LRs Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Advocate. Versus SHRI DALBIR SINGH (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of M.P. and anr Vs. Rajendra Prasad Pandey and ors
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-18-2013
Education
Shri. J.L.Mishra
W.P.No.5343/1998 (State of MP and another versus R.P.Pandey and otheRs.18.07.2013 Shri Akash Choudhary, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri J.L.Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. From a perusal of the record it is clear...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinay Kumar Gupta Vs. Smt. Satya Rani
Delhi
Nov-18-2013
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: November 18, 2013 + CM(M) 1381/2010 & CM No.19625/2010 VINAY KUMAR GUPTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.R.P. Pandey, Adv. versus SMT. SATYA RANI...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashfaque Brother and Others. Vs. Additional District Judge, Court No. ...
Allahabad
Oct-04-2010
Tenancy
1. Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.P. Pandey appearing for caveator respondent and perused the record. 2. Landlady respondent no. 3 filed an application under section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal (1), Allahaba ...
Allahabad
Jan-28-2002
Labour and Industrial
2002(2)AWC1138; [2002(93)FLR414]; (2002)2UPLBEC1108
D. Kumar Pandey and ;R.P. Pandey, Advs.
Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-employer has challenged the award dated 29.10.1996 and the orders dated 24.6.1996 and 9.9.1996, which have become part...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj Bali Singh Vs. the Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-17-1971
Property
Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 171, 209 and 210; Constitution of India - Article 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32
AIR1972All291
R.P. Pandey, ;C.S.P. Singh, ;Shiv Shankar Pandey, Advs. and ;Standing Counsel
R.B. Misra, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution arising out of a consolidation matter. 2. The dispute between the parties relates to a large number of Khatas spread over in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. Martandsingh Joodeo
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-27-1984
Civil
Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 57
AIR1984MP92
R.P. Pandey, Adv.
Oza, Ag. C.J.1. This is a reference made by the Chief Revenue Authority to this Court under Section 57(1), Stamp Act. It was a revision petition filed before the Chief Revenue Authority against an order passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India Vs. Plastichem and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
May-08-1991
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 11
1992(0)MPLJ689
R.P. Pandey, Adv.
ORDERB.C. Verma, J.1. By the impugned order, the trial Court has permitted the decretal debt to be discharged in instalments of Rs. 80,000.00 per year. The direction is that upon nonpayment of two consecutive instalments, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishwa Mohan Sinha Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Patna
Aug-26-1996
Criminal
P.K. Sarin, J.1. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) the petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 23.7.1996 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Patna,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHira Lal Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-27-2003
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
2003(1)AWC1459
Vikas Sahai and ;Seema Agrawal, Advs. and S.C.
S.K. Singh, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order of suspension dated 3.2.2003 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent No. 1.2. At the time of initial hearing,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »