Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r p mohapatra · Page 1 of about 34 results (0.098 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 13 1995

Sailendra Barik and ors. Vs. Addl. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-13-1995

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Orissa Scheduled Area Transfer of Immovable Parties by Scheduled Tribes Regulations, 1956 - Regulation 7A; Survey and Settlement Act, 1958 - Sections 15

Reported in : 1995(I)OLR412

Advocate for Respondent : Addl. Govt. Adv. for opp. parteis 1 and 2 and ;R.P. Mohapatra, S.N, Mohapatra and K.R. Mohapatra for opp. party No. 3

1. In a proceeding under the Orissa Scheduled Areas Transfer of Immovable Property (By Scheduled Tribes) Regulation, 1956, commonly known as Regulation 2 of 1956, sale in favour of petitioners father Kunja Barik by opp. party...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1996

Debu Alias Degu Bag Alias Goud Vs. State

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-13-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 200, 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : 81(1996)CLT891; 1996CriLJ1903

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Mohapatra, Additional S.C.

D.M. Patnaik, J.1. In this appeal, the appellant assails his conviction under Section 302, Indian Penal Code, and sentence of imprisonment for life.2. Prosecution case, shortly stated, is that on 16-8-1989, around 2 p.m. while deceased...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1996

Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-29-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1997Ori37; 82(1996)CLT917

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Mohapatra, Addl. Standing Counsel

Dipak Misra, J.1. The petitioner, an Ex-Sarpanch of Pachhikote Grama Panchayat on behalf of public of the aforesaid Grama Panchayat has approached this Court in the present writ application for issuance of appropriate writ commanding the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 11 1995

Rangadhar Barik Vs. State

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-11-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1996CriLJ5; 1995(II)OLR257

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Mohapatra, Addl. Standing Counsel

A. Pasayat, J. 1. Rangadhar Barik (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') having been found guilty for offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian, Penal Code, 1860 (in short, 'IPC') by learned Sessions Judge, Keonjhar in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1995

Mahabir Harro Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-11-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 134; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300 and 304

Reported in : 1996CriLJ158; 1995(II)OLR328

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Mohapatra, Addl. Standing Counsel

A. Pasayat, J.1. Accusation of commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, 'IPC') having been accepted, and conviction made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rourkela. Mahabir Harro...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1992

U.K. Ghosh Vs. Voltas Ltd. and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-14-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1994Ori131

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Ratho, Biswanath Rath, R.P. Mohapatra, B. Senapati, S.N. Mohapatra, K.R. Mohapatra, S. Ghosh, J. Rath, S.K. Jethy and M.K. Panda

ORDERS.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Order in a high valuation suit and counter-claim tried at Talcher is impugned in this Civil Revision. Earlier this Court had fixed time for disposal of the suit which could not be materialised...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1987

Gangadhar Somarath and ors. Vs. Honu Majhi and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-02-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1988Ori141

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Ratho, ;P.K. Bhuyan, ;Manoj Misra, ;R.P. Mohapatra and ;R. Bose, Advs.

ORDERS.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Defendant 11 is the petitioner in this Civil Revision.2. Plaintiffs filed the suit where in para 14, they prayed for the reliefs. It reads as follows : --'Therefore, the plaintiffs pray the Honourable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1991

Smt. Kamala Devi Vs. Rajanikanta Patnaik and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-13-1991

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372

Reported in : AIR1992Ori301

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Ratho, M. Mishra, R.P. Mohapatra, B. Senapati, B. Rath and S.N. Mohapatra

ORDERA. Pasayat, J.1. Petitioner calls in question correctness of order passed by learned Subordinate Judge, Berhampur allowing an application filed by opp. parties 1 and 2 under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act (in short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1999

Lokesh Chandra Pradhan Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-06-1999

Subject : Service

Reported in : 89(2000)CLT73; 2000(I)OLR120

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Mohapatra, Standing Counsel

L. Mohapatra, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the order dated 28.8.1997, Annexure-13 whrerin his representation for approval for the post of Lecturer occupied by him has been turned down on the ground that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1987

Malati Padhiyani Vs. Krutibas Padhi (Dead) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-09-1987

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rules 12 and 18 - Order 26, Rule 14

Reported in : AIR1989Ori100

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Ratho, ;P.K. Bhuyan, ;M. Mishra and ;R.P. Mohapatra, Advs. (for No. 4)

S.C. Mohaptra, J.1. Plaintiff is the appellant against a final decree in a suit for partition.2. After the preliminary decree ascertaining the share of parties, the final decree proceeding was initiated for allotment of the lands...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial