Advanced Search Results
Sanjay and Ors Vs. the State and Anr
Delhi
Nov-24-2014
Education
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4352/2014 SANJAY & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. R. P. Bhardwaj, Advocate with petitioners. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay and Ors Vs. The State and Anr
Delhi
Nov-24-2014
Education
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4352/2014 SANJAY & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. R. P. Bhardwaj, Advocate with petitioners. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Bhagwan @ Kale Vs. State
Delhi
Jan-05-2012
Land Acquisition
Mr. Manoj Ohri
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Rev.P. 187/2009 % Reserved on: 19th December, 2011 Decided on: 5th January, 2012 JAI BHAGWAN @ KALE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Sharma and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sanjay and ors Vs. the State and anr
Delhi
Nov-24-2014
Education
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4352/2014 SANJAY & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. R. P. Bhardwaj, Advocate with petitioners. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Amrit Kaur Vs. Shri Rattan Lal
Delhi
May-29-2015
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 233/2013 Reserved on:7. h May , 2015 Decided on:29. h May, 2015 % SMT AMRIT KAUR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Amarjit Singh, Adv. versus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRattan Singh Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Mar-11-1991
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23(2) and 28
1991(21)DRJ113
Shri. R.P. Bhardwaj
Anil Dev Singh, J. (1) By means of this application, the applicants seek correction/modification of the judgment and order of this court dated September 14, 1984 in R.F.A. No. 202 of 1967. In the R.F.A this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSavitri Devi Vs. Ramesh Chand and ors.
Delhi
May-19-2003
CriminalFamily
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406 and 498A
2003CriLJ2759; 104(2003)DLT824; II(2003)DMC328; 2003(69)DRJ6
R.P. Bhardwaj, Adv.
J.D. Kapoor, J.1. Though State has the locus standi to prefer such petitions, since petitioner is the wife and on her complaint case was registered and charge sheet was filed, and has grievance against the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.P. Bansal, Ias and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Mar-10-2003
MRTP
(2003)(3)SLJ114CAT
1. The most point which falls for consideration and determination in the present two Original Applications is with regard to the fixation of seniority and the year of allotment of the State Civil Service Officers (for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPratap Singh (Pensioner) Vs. Director, Subsidiary
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Aug-23-2006
Land Acquisition
(2007)(2)SLJ185CAT
Shri. Rajesh Katyal
1. By virtue of this O.A, a retiree from Government Service has assailed an order passed by the respondents on 20.12.2005, where on non-applicability of Civil Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1944' (hereinafter referred to as CS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinspecting Assistant Vs. Srikrishan Khanna
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Sep-08-1993
Direct Taxation
(1994)48ITD1(Delhi)
1. While Revenue is in appeal, assessee is in cross objection for assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75. Several common issues have been raised both in the appeals and the cross objections preferred by the assessee. Therefore,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »