Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r p bansal · Page 1 of about 89 results (0.116 seconds)

Oct 10 2002

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Surjan Singh,

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-10-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(10), 2(14) and 256(1); Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 1(2), 2(52) and 507

Reported in : (2002)178CTR(Del)547; 101(2002)DLT21; [2003]260ITR351(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and ; P. D. Sharma, Adv.

D.K. Jain, J. 1. In these ten references, at the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short the Tribunal) has referred under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2009

Jitender Singh Tyagi Vs. Director of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 24(3); Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - Rule 98

Reported in : 157(2009)DLT589

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv.,; Rakesh Mahajan,; Prabhat Ranjan

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This Review Petition has been filed by the Applicants/Respondents No. 2 and 3 seek review of the judgment/order dated 3rd October, 2008 passed by this Court in LPA No. 1991 of 2006 whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2002

Mr. Zulfiquar Ali Khan and ors. Vs. J.K. Helene Curtis Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-07-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 14 - Order 12, Rule 6; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)208; AIR2002Delhi425; 2002(62)DRJ442

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and ; S.K. Gandhi, Adv.

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. This is an application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking decree for possession on the admissions made by defendant No. 1 in the written statement.2. It is pointed out at the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jul 20 1998

Sanjay Gupta Vs. M/S. Jakki Mull and Sons

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-20-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1998VIAD(Delhi)292; 75(1998)DLT50; 1998(47)DRJ185

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arun Jaitely, ; Mr. R.P. Bansal, Senior Advs., ; Mr. Ma

A.K. Srivastava, J.1. This is an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC making a prayer that defendant No.3, namely, M/s. Liberty Sales Services be restrained from handing over the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1998

Madhukar Goel Vs. M.S. Goel

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-11-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(1); Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 23

Reported in : AIR1998Delhi257; 1998(45)DRJ238; 1998RLR516

Advocate for Respondent : Sh. R.P. Bansal, Sr. Advocate and ; Sh. P.R. Aggarwal, Adv.;

ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Petitioner has filed is No. 8099/95 alleging that with the mutual consent of the parties Sh. V.G. Baliga was appointed as an arbitrator and he made the award on 9th May, 1993. Petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2002

Munish Gupta and ors. Vs. Ram Dass and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-14-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(2) and 11(5); Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 99(2002)DLT618; [2003]42SCL624(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tiwari, Adv. for respondents 1 and 2 and ; R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and ;

K.S. Gupta, J.1. 1. Petitioners filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the 'Act') seeking appointment of arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes referred to in para No. 13...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2006

Nand Kishore and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-01-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30

Reported in : 2007(94)DRJ282

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv.,; D.S. Khatri, Adv. for Respondent No. 4,;

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. These writ petitions challenge the Order dated 3.1.2006 passed by the Land Acquisition Collector (LAC), North West, Khanjawala, Delhi, Respondent No. 2. The said order reads as under:Notice is issued and placed in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2017

Rajnish Goenka vs.state & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-01-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:1. t December, 2017 1. CRL.M.C. 4542/2016 & CRL.M.A.18997/2016 SEWAK BALKISHAN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sunil Magoo, Adv....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2017