Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r mohan · Page 1 of about 912 results (0.361 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 12 1997

M/S Silk Import and Export Inc. Vs. M/S Exim Aides Silk Exporter and A ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-12-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 418 and 420; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2595

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mohan, Adv. and ;M.H. Ibrahim, H.C.G.P.

ORDER1. This is a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to reverse and set aside the order dated 5-7-1996 passed by the learned Magistrate referring the complaint presented by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1986

G. Vasu Vs. Syed Yaseen SifuddIn Quadri

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-08-1986

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 4, 101, 104 and 114

Reported in : AIR1987AP139

Advocate for Respondent : G.V.R. Mohan Rao, Adv.

Jagannadha Rao, J.1. This reference to a Full Bench has been made on the ground that there is a conflict between Division Bench judgments, viz. M. Janaka Lakshmi v. Madhava Rao, : AIR1973AP103 rendered by Chinnappa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2001

R. Jamuna Bai Vs. M.A. Anusuya and 3 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122 and 123

Reported in : AIR2001Mad392; (2001)2MLJ355

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T.K. Seshadri and ;Mr. R. Mohan, Advs.

ORDER1. This is the story of a Jinxed deed. The events of the case makes one wonder if the deed carried the curse of death with it.2. One Varadaiya Chetty, owner of the suit property executed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 16 2005

M. Anbazhagan and ors. Vs. Mahboob Basha,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-16-2005

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : (2005)2MLJ615

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohan, Adv.

M. Thanikachalam, J.1. The defendants in O.S.No.331/90 on the file of the District Munsif, Chengalpattu, who were successful in resisting the suit filed by the plaintiffs therein, failed to sustain the same, when the Judgment was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 1982

Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. B. Pandaiah and Company

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-21-1982

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184 and 185

Reported in : (1983)35CTR(AP)84; [1983]143ITR464(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : G.V.R. Mohan Rao, Adv.

Jeevan Reddy J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, has referred the following question for our opinion under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1995

Government of Tamil Nadu and Another Vs. Vasantha Bai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-07-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 5A, 6 and 11A

Reported in : AIR1995SC1778; JT1997(10)SC511; 1995(2)SCALE849; 1995Supp(2)SCC423; [1995]3SCR258; 1995(2)LC438(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohan, ; V.G. Pragasam and ; R. nedumaran, Advs.

1. Leave granted.2. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (for short, 'the Act'), as amended by Central Act 68 of 1984 was published in the gazette on April 12, 1988 acquiring an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1996

Metagraphs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-20-1996

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1)

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)132; 1997(58)ECC93; 1996(88)ELT630(SC); 1996(8)SCALE464; (1997)1SCC262; [1996]Supp8SCR872; [1997]106STC180(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohan and Sushma Suri, Advs.

K. Venkataswami, J.1. The only question that arises for our consideration in all these Appeals is whether 'Printed Aluminium Labels' (hereinafter referred to as 'labels') manufactured by the appellant are 'products of the printing industry' within...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2007

Bidhannagar (Salt Lake) Welfare Association Vs. Central Valuation Boar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-18-2007

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Amendment) Act, 1994; West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 - Sections 110; West Bengal Central Valuation Board Act, 1978 - Sections 6, 6((1)(A) (2)), 6((1)(B)(2)), 9, 9(1), 9(4), 10, 10(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 14(1), 15, 15(3), 116(3), 178 and 269D; Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 - Sections 106; Tenancy Act; Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act, 2002 - Sections 101(1), 101(2) and 106(1A); Human Rights Act, 1998 - Sections 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 303; West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Valuation of Lands and Building) Rules, 1984 - Rule 62(7); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 311(2)

Reported in : AIR2007SC2276; (SCSuppl)2007(3)CHN95; 2007(7)SCALE546; (2007)6SCC668; 2007AIRSCW3962

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohan, ASG, ; Altaf Ahmad, Sr. Adv., ; H.K. Puri, ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Validity or otherwise of certain provisions of the West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Amendment) Act, 1994 (for short 'the Amendment Act') is in question in these appeals which arise out of a judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 30 1974

Pillalamarri Vara Prasada Sarma Vs. Pillamarri Seshalakshmi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-30-1974

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1975AP239

Advocate for Respondent : V.R. Mohan Rao, Adv.

Ramachandra Rao, J. 1. This is a husband's appeal against the order of restitution of conjugal rights passed by the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad in O. P. No. 134 of 1969. The appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2004

Escorts Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-ii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-25-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 4(4); Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975 - Rule 6

Reported in : 2004(96)ECC545; 2004(173)ELT113(SC); JT2004(9)SC265; 2004(9)SCALE6; (2004)8SCC335

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohan, Additional Solicitor General, ; Krishnamoorthy Swamy, ;

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (in short the 'CEGAT') in Appeal Nos. E/1574 & 3180/93-A & E/1668/94-A. The factual background...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial