Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r mani · Page 1 of about 351 results (0.401 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 14 1990

Pappa Vs. Shanmughathammal and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-14-1990

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Hindu Law; Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 6, 10, 19 and 23; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 87 and 118; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1991Mad90; (1991)IIMLJ555

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Mani, ;Sr. Counsel, for K. Sampath, Counsel

ORDERK.M. Natarajan, J.1. This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the II Additional Subordinate Judge Madurai, in O. S. No. 486 of 1977 dismissing the suit filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1991

Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth Annamalai Vs. Mrs. Valliammai Achi, W/O of Late Dr. Al ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : T.N. Court-fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Schedule - Sections 55, 56, 61 and 63 - Articles 1 to 6, 7, 11(K); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 261, 264, 265, 266, 268, 276, 284, 295 and 299; High Court Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rules 4, 25, 55, 689, 690 and 692; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 1908 - Sections 26, 75 to 78, 86, 87-B, 90 to 92, 94, 95, 100, 104, 141 and 144 - Order 41 Rule 1; Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order 2, Rules 2, 20 to 50, 51 to 68; Government of India Act, 1915; Indian Oaths Act, 1873; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Parition Act, 1893; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Divorce Act,1869; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Indian Stamp Act, 1899;

Reported in : AIR1991Mad284

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T.R. Mani, ;Sr. Adv., for M/s. T.M. Hariharan and ;P.R. Balasubramanian, Adv.

ORDER1. On 4-3-1988 the plaintiff filed the O. P. No. 197 of 1988 under Ss. 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with O. XXV, Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1978

S. Duraiswami Nadar Vs. Additional Special Deputy Collector (Land Acqu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-19-1978

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30

Reported in : AIR1978Mad313

Advocate for Respondent : N.R. Chandran, Adv. for Govt. Pleader and ;T.R. Mani, Adv.

Mohan, J.1. The following lands were acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894:--R. S. 1228/77 .. 20 acresR. S. 1231/4 .. 7 acresR. S. 1229/4 .. 17.5 acres These lands belonged to Tiruchendur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 07 2005

Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam Senniappa ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-2005

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act - Sections 108; ;Indian Trusts Act; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 14 and 14(1); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80, 80(2), 92, 104(1) - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 27; ;Hindu law

Reported in : (2005)3MLJ149

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;M. Duraiswamy, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 in A.S. No. 606 of 1989, ;G. Sukumaran, Special Government Pleader for Respondent No. 1 in A.S. No. 851 of 1989 and A.S. No. 606 of

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. An interesting question of law arises in the appeal in A.S. No. 851 of 1989 regarding the character of the Will left by one Palaniappa Chettiar (testator) and his wife Chinnammal @ Rangammal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1989

Valliammal Vs. Kamalambal and 8 ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-21-1989

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 11, 16 and 16(3); Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1976; Madras Hindu Bigamy Prevention and Divorce Act, 1949 - Sections 4

Reported in : II(1990)DMC574

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Mani, Adv. for ;R. Nagarajan, Adv.

Sathiadev, J. 1. This appeal is preferred by plaintiffs in O.S. No. 3116 of 1979 on the file of City Civil Court, Madras. Defendants are the respondents herein.2. The suit was filed by appellants/plaintiffs (ranking of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2008

Embassy Hotels (P) Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director Mr. Abdul ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 26 - Order 41, Rules 5, 5(1), 5(3), 6, 6(1) and 6(2)

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ1219

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Mani, Sr. Adv. for; S. Jayaraman, Adv.

ORDERA.C. Arumugaperumal Adityan, J.1. This revision has been directed against the order passed in E.A. No. 1075 of 2007 in E.P. No. 1 of 2007 in O.S. No 1538 of 1980 on the file of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1995

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board Rep. by Chairman Vs. A. Viswam and 10 ors ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-16-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC493

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;A. Muthukrishnan, Adv.

ORDERArumugham, J.1. By invoking Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C, the Tamilnadu Housing Board sought to review the judgment and decree rendered by this Court by Justice Swamidurai,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2000

inum Beevi Vs. K.S. Syed Ahamed Kabir (Died) and 15 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-17-2000

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 45, 101 and 103;

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ307

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T.R. Mani, ;Senior Counsel For Mr. T.M. Hariharan, Adv.

ORDER1. The defendant is the appellant. 2. The respondent filed a suit for partition of his three fourth share in the suit property and have separate possession of three fourth suit property and other reliefs. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2001

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd. (a Government ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 18 and 23; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Mineral Concessions Rules, 1960 - Rule 53; Land Acquisition Mines Act, 1885 - Sections 3 and 25

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ771

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel

ORDERP. Shanmugam, J.1. The second respondent before the Principal Sub-court, Tirunelveli (Reference Court under L.A.O.P) is the appellant herein. A total extent of 44.401/2 acres of lands were acquired for mining of limestone for Tamil Nadu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1986

Gomathi Vs. Kumaraguruparan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-09-1986

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10 and 13(1-A)

Reported in : AIR1987Mad259

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mani, Adv.

ORDER1. This civil revision is preferred by the wife, against the orders of the subordinate Judge,Tirunelveli, passed in I.A. 87 of 1985 in H.M.O.P. 37 of 1980.2. The brief facts of the case ire as follows-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial