Advanced Search Results

Mangesh Janardhan Mohite (President) and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 16, 41, 42, 76, 95B and 184; Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 33(7); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 44

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR660; 2002(5)BomCR653

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., i/b., Sameer Tendulkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 1288/2001 and in C. S. No. 171/2001 in W.P. No. 1288/2001, for respondent Nos. 13 to 15, ;P. Janardhanan, A.G. and R.M. Sawant, G.P.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These two petitions raise important questions of law with respect to some of the provisions of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'MHAD Act') concerning development of acquired...

Sylvia Leo Carvgalho Vs. the Collector of Mumbai and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 143(2); Bombay Prohibition (Privileges Fees) Rules, 1954 - Rule 5; Maharashtra Country Liquor Rules, 1973

Reported in : 2000(2)ALLMR4; 2000(3)BomCR158; (2000)2BOMLR9; 2000(2)MhLj781

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Sawant, Adv.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Mr. R.M. Sawant, Government Pleader waives service for respondents. 2. By consent, rule is heard forthwith. 3. Brief facts as set out by the petitioner in the writ petition are:...

N.Y. Gupte and anr. Vs. High Court of Judicature at Bombay and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 7; Bombay Judicial Services Recruitment Rules, 1956 - Rule 5, 5(1) and 5(6); Constitution of India - Articles 233, 234, 236, 309 and 372

Reported in : 2002(3)BomCR707

Advocate for Respondent : Gulam Vahanvati, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;A.A. Kumbhakoni, Adv. for respondent No. 28, ;Abhay Oka, Adv. for respondent No. 29 and ;R.M. Sawant, G.P., for respondent No. 53;M.P. Vashi, K.K.V. Kurup

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is concerning the appointment to the post of Principal Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai. The petition seeks to challenge the High...

Mani D. Seervai ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra (Through the Secretary M ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 39 , 47, 59, 61, 67, 68, 72, 74, 82, 86(3), 88, 91(6), 92 and 154

Reported in : AIR2001Bom229; 2001(2)ALLMR444; 2001(2)BomCR566; (2001)1BOMLR676

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Virendra Tulzapurkar and ;Mr. Anand Desai, Advs. i/b ;M/S. Shah, Desai, ;Doijode and ;Phatarphekar;Mr. R.m. Sawant And ;Mr. K.R. Belosey, Advs.

S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. In the above Writ Petition, the Petitioners are challenging the Third variation of Town Planning Scheme, being Santacruz Town Planning - II, which variation was notified on 8th July, 1998 and finally...

Meher Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 105; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2002(2)ALLMR440; (2002)1BOMLR372; 2002(3)MhLj36

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Sawant, Adv. and ;R.M. Sawant, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1, ;A.K. Abhyankar and ;A.C. Shah, Advs. for Respondent No. 2

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. The 1st petitioner herein is a company engaged in the manufacture of country liquor. The 2nd petitioner is its Managing Director. The 1st petitioner company at the relevant time was engaged in...

Environsare Foundation Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Secretary and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(2); Coastal Region Zone Rules - Rule 5(3)

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR519

Advocate for Respondent : H.V. Mehta, Adv. in W.P. No. 41/2002 for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 in W.P. No. 1397/2002 for Respondent No. 1, ;R.M. Sawant, G.P. in W.P. No. 41/2002 for Respondent No. 2 in W.P. No. 1397/2002 for Respo

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These two petitions seek to challenge the legality and propriety of a pipeline of a distance of about 8.5 k.m. set up by respondent No. 8 Indian Oil Tanking Limited (I.D.T.L.) for carrying...

Salve B.S. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ674Bom

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Sawant, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;V.M. Jayakar, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

Ranjana Desai, J.1. The petitioner has by way of this petition prayed inter alia, for a direction or order directing the Government of Maharashtra to forthwith enter into a reciprocal arrangement with the Central Government for...

Navi Mumbai Hawkers and Workers Union and Others Vs. the State of Maha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 313-A, 384 and 385; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 32 and 226; Trade Unions Act, 1926; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 113; U.P. Municipality Act, 1916 - Sections 293 and 298; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 27-A

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR596; 1998(3)BomCR458; 1998(3)MhLj438

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Sawant, A.G., ;B.P. Apte, A.A.G., ;U.G. Kerkar, ;R.S. Apte and ;R.M. Sawant, Advs.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel; Dr. Chandrachud for petitioners; Mr. C.J. Sawant, Advocate General for respondent Nos. 1 and 5; Mr. B.R Apte, Advocate General for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and Mr....

Shamrao Shripat Tamgade and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilConstitution

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR55; 2006(6)BomCR11; [2007(2)JCR121(NULL)]

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The petitioner Shamrao Shripat Tamgade (Writ Petition No. 214 of 1993) after passing the SSC Examination in 1958 was initially appointed as an English Section Writer in the Court of the District Judge,...

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Land Development Corpora ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 6; Bombay Salsette Estate Act, 1951 - Sections 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR24

Advocate for Respondent : Miland Sathe and ;Sheela John, Advs., i/b., M.P. Savila and Co. in W.P. No. 1052/1998 for respondent No. 1

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Writ Petition No. 1052 of 1998 is filed by the State of Maharashtra against respondent No. 1 for an appropriate writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside the order passed by the...