Advanced Search Results

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

-:1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA Writ Petition Nos.2642/2009 (GM-MM-S)...

Bitragunta Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. Depot Manager, Apsrtc and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2(2), 2A and 2K; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 and 11; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 45; Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Employees (Classification, Control and Appeal) Regulations, 1967 - Regulations 11, 12 and 22 to 27; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD95

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Reddy, (SC)

Elipe Dharma Rao, J.1. Aggrieved of the judgment and decree dated 25.6.2004 passed in A.S. No. 1 of 2004 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kavali, confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2003 passed in O.S....

T. Indira Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : 2002(5)ALT203

Advocate for Respondent : Ghanta Rama Rao, SC for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;R.M. Reddy, Adv. for Respondent No. 6

ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. Since these writ petitions are connected they heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.Writ Petition No. 29837 of 1998:2. This writ petition is filed by the owner of Flat...

P. Venganna Shetty and Brothers Rep. by Its Authorised Signatory Sri K ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : EnvironmentProperty

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Karnataka Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2003 - Rule 2; Forest Rules, 1969

Reported in : 2009(5)AIRKarR247(D.B)

Advocate for Respondent : Basavarj Kareddy, GA

P.D. Dinakaran, C.J.1.1. The petitioner is an 'User Agency' as defined under Rule 2(h) of the Karnataka Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2003. Admittedly, the impugned quarry is in the forest area, which requires the prior permission under...

Tapas Ghosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 38, 39 and 41

Reported in : (1990)1CALLT50(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : H.K. Dev Barman and ;Ila Chatterjee, Advs.

Mahitosh Majumdar, J.1. This writ application is directed against the action of the respondents in not absorbing and/or appointing the petitioner as Group 'D' employee in the service of the Defence Research and Development Organisation, Defence...