Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r m parekh · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.151 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 09 1976

Bahirumal Basdev Vs. Lalit Kishore

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-09-1976

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 41, Rule 25; Rent (Amendment) Act

Reported in : AIR1976Raj244

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Parekh, Adv.

S.N. Modi, J.1. This is a second appeal by defendant-tenant against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Kota, dated May 2, 1975, in a suit for eviction and arrears of rent.2. The dispute relates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1984

Rana Electrical Industries Vs. Jyoti Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-10-1984

Subject : Civil

Acts : Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 9(1), 14, 18, 33, 34, 35 and 36; Presidency Small Cause Courts (Bombay) Rules - Rules 9, 36 and 37; Limitation Act - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1985Bom446; 1984(2)BomCR648; 1984MhLJ851

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Parekh and;K. Shashidharan, Advs.

ORDER1. The only question which requires consideration in these writ petitions is to find out as to whether the Registrar of the Small Cause Court had jurisdiction to grant leave to sue under S. 18(a) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1967

Narayandas S. Kanuga Vs. Sarasvatibai D. Joshi and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-1967

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 54 and 58

Reported in : AIR1968Bom280; (1967)69BOMLR622; 1967MhLJ946

Advocate for Respondent : S.T. Tijoriwala, ;R.M. Parekh, ;K.J. Abhyankar and ;A.M. Desai, Advs.

(1) There is a rectangular plot of land abutted on two sides by road-on the south by B. J. Road and on the east Gram Panchayat Road. It measures 1895 Sq. Yards. Small plots of land,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 03 1984

Meteor Satellite Ltd. and Telstar Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-03-1984

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1985)(22)ELT271TriDel

1. This Appeal No. 1228/83-Meteor Satellite v. Collector of Central Excise, Baroda and Appeal No. 1229/ 83 (Telstar Electronic, Ahmedabad v. Collector of Central Excise, Baroda) arising out of the same order dated 30-12-1982 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2002

Smt. Prabhawati Tokersi Chheda Vs. Maharashtra Housing and Area Develo ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-27-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 77, 79(2), 91(5), 92, 93 and 94(5); ;Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rent Control Act, 1947 - Sections 19, 20, 21 and 28; Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 353A and 354A; Limitation Act; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 31, 31C, 32 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 23, Rule 1(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR579

Advocate for Respondent : Denzil Dmello, ;Savla, ;S.H. Doctor, ;J.M. Sidhwa, ;DCruz, Advs., i/b., Mehta & Girdharlal, ;A.K. Abhyankar and ;A.A. Joshi, Advs., i/b., C.Y. Bane, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. This Writ Petition invoking Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India is filed by a tenant of aa building which became dilapidated and wastherefore demolished and reconstructed, but thetenant has not been provided with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2003

Ravindra Mutneja, Vs. Bhavan Corporation a Partnership Firm, Registere ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-27-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 7A, 10, 11 and 12; Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Rules, 1964 - Rule 9; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966; Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888; Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Regulations - Regulations 23, 28 and 29

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR521; 2003(5)BomCR695

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Abhyankar, Adv., i/b., Shiralkar & Co. for Defendants/Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 5 and ;Sangeeta V. Mehta, Adv. for Defendant/Respondent No. 2

F.I. Rebello, J. 1. The appellants herein have preferred this Appeal against the order dated 19.12.2001, whereby a learned Judge of the City Civil Court dismissed Notice of Motion No. 2932 of 2001 in S.C. Suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1980

Nemi Chand Singhvi and ors. Vs. D.S. Sandhu and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-06-1980

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)364

K.D. Sharma, Actg. C.J.1. This is a writ petition filed by Nemi Chand Singhvi, Surendra Chand Singhvi, Shyambehari Chand Singhvi and Omprakash Chand Singhvi under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:(a)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial