Advanced Search Results

In Re: Om Prakash Kapoor Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ844Cal

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Chatterjee and ;Archana Sengupta, Advs.

ORDERParitosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.The present writ petition was moved challenging the order of suspension dated December 18, 1980, being Annexure 'G' to the petition, on behalf of Om Prakash Kapoor, Deputy Manager (Administration), Braithwaite & Co....

Paradise Hotel and Restaurant Vs. Airport Authority of India and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

D. Biswas, J.1. Received an application filed under Sections 8, 9 read with Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, 1996. Seen the application and certified copy of the arbitration agreement. Heard the learned counsel appearing for...

Brijratan Vs. Jaynarain

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1910)ILR37Cal649

Chttty, J.1. These are two rules obtained by the defendants in suit No. 85 of 1909, calling on the plaintiffs to show cause (i) why the decree in the suit should not be amended by inserting...

Jessop and Company Limited Vs. Larsen and Company Limited

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ArbitrationSICA

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11, 12 and 33;; Sick Industrial Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22 and 22(1)

Reported in : (1998)3CALLT326(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pradip Ghosh and ;Mr. Ranjan Sinha, Advs.

A. Lala, J.1. This is an application of the petitioner under sections 5, 11, 12 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.2. By making this application the petitioner wanted a direction for stay of the arbitration...

Brijratan and ors. Vs. JaynaraIn and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.876

Chitty, J.1. These are two rules obtained by the defendants in Suit No. 85 of 1909, calling on the plaintiff to show cause (i) why the decree in the suit should not be amended by inserting...

Raibahadur Bissessurlal Motilal Haluwasiya Trust and anr. Vs. Presidin ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 15(2); ;West Bengal Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1986; ;Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1969

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ104Cal

Advocate for Respondent : Parthasarathi Sen Gupta, ;Arunava Ghosh, ;Partha Bhanja Chowdhury and ;Swarup Paul, Advs.

ORDERS.B. Sinha, J.1. Both the appeals and the writ application filed by the appellants herein involving similar questions of fact and law were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common...

The Calcutta Dock Labour Board and ors. Vs. Saroj Kumar Dutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Administrative Law

Reported in : (1988)2CALLT204(HC),92CWN963

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Chatterjee and ;C.R. Chakraborty, Advs.

G.N. Ray, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment passed by the learned trial Judge on 14th January, 1988 in a writ proceeding initiated on the basis of the application made by the writ petitioner...

Jas Enterprises Vs. the Karanpara Development Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 12, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : (1997)2CALLT277(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Chatterjee, Adv.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. This application has been made under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance 1996, which has since been replaced by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, inter alia, for leave to the...

Milan Kumar Pradhan and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1999Cal5

Advocate for Respondent : Anindya Mitra, ;M.M. Roy, ;A.K. Das, ;R.M. Chatterjee, ;Monika Chatterjee, ;S.L. Hazra, ;Ranjan Roy and ;A.N. Singh, Advs.

ORDER1. Both the writ applications involving same questions of fact and law were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. These two writ applications by way of Public Interest...

Messers Duke Offshore Limited Vs. Burns Standard Company Ltd. and Anot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationSICA

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22; Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 11

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR371

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Chatterjee and ;B.M. Chatterjee, Advs.

ORDERF.I. Rebello, J.1. By this petition the petitioners had sought a declaration that an arbitral dispute exists between the petitioners and the respondents and during the pendency of the arbitral dispute prayed that the respondent No....