Advanced Search Results
Smt. Kempamma W/O. Late Chikkashankarappa Vs. the Deputy Commissioner,
Karnataka
Jun-29-2009
Property
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 128 and 129; Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 - Rule 65
R. Kumar, HCGP for R1 to R3 and ;M.C. Ramachandra and Associates for R4
ORDERL. Narayana Swamy, J.1. The petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner in R.A. No. 149/1996-97 dated 19,05.2008 and also the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner in No. RA/117/2005-06 dated 05.04.2008 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad Vs. Sarabhai Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-21-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 209(1), 209(2), 209(3), 209(5), 210, 212, 215, 271(1), 273(2) and 274
[2008]307ITR89(SC); JT2008(12)SC464; 2008(14)SCALE454; (2009)1SCC28
E.R. Kumar, ; Sameer Parekh and ; Rukhmini Bobde, Advs.
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This Judgment will dispose of two Appeals, they being Civil Appeal Nos. 482 of 2003 and 483 of 2003. These Appeals are filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Krishna Swamy S/O Late D.M. Muniyappa and ors. Vs. Smt. Byramma W/O ...
Karnataka
Aug-26-2008
Property
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 136(2) and 136(3); Constitution of India - Article 227
H.T. Vasanth Kumar, Adv. for R6 and C/R8, ;Jeevan Kumar, Adv. for Giri Kumar S.V., Adv. for R8(A-C) and R9, ;Sathya Prabha, Adv. for R15 and ;R. Kumar, HCGP for R13, R14, R16, R17 and R18
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are persons who are very keen that the revenue entries in respect of the following extents of lands in different survey numbers of Sompura village, Nelamangala taluk:All the piece and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nanjappa S/O Late Gangaiah Vs. Government of Karnataka, Land Revenue D ...
Karnataka
Nov-24-2008
Property
Karnataka Land Revenue Act; Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969 - Rules 1(1), 2(15), 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 12 and 12(1) to 12(3); Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961
ILR2009KAR1399; 2009(5)KarLJ147
R. Kumar, HCGP
ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. Petitioner is the owner of the agricultural land bearing Survey No. 114, measuring 1 acre 30 guntas, situated at Jakanahalli Village, Nelmangala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District. According to him, he has been in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPenorama Overseas Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.
Delhi
Feb-23-2007
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482
2007(95)DRJ542
R.R. Kumar, Adv.
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. This present petition is preferred for recall of the summoning order dated 06.12.2001 of the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate, on a Complaint filed by the Respondent (hereafter 'the complainant') and quashing of criminal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExcise Commissioner and anr. Vs. Mysore Sales International Ltd. and o ...
Karnataka
Mar-13-2006
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 44AC, 119, 120(1), 120(2), 120(4), 124(2), 124(3), 124(4), 124(5), 206C, 206C(1), 206C(2), 206C(3), 206C(5), 206C(6), 206C(7), 206C(9) and 206C(11); Finance Act, 1992; Karnataka Excise Act, 1963 ; Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 5(3); Karnataka Excise (Lease of Right of Retail Vend of Liquors) Rules, 1969 - Rule 3; Karnataka Excise (Arrack Vend Special Conditions of Licenses) Rules, 1967 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227
[2006]286ITR136(KAR); [2006]286ITR136(Karn)
K.R. Kumar, ;Sarangan and ;R.B. Krishna, Advs.
V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. The appellants Mysore Sales International Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'MSIL' in short) and the Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'MSCL' in short) and the State Government represented by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Andhra Prabha (P.) Ltd.
Chennai
Apr-22-1998
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A, 32A(1) and 32A(2)
[2000]244ITR776(Mad)
R. Kumar, Adv. for;T.N. Seetharaman, Adv.
Janarthanam, J.1. The assessee, Andhra Prabha (Private) Limited, is being assessed to tax in the status of a company. For the assessment year 1981-82, the assessee claimed that investment allowance should be granted on the machinery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tirupur Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar ...
Chennai
Nov-20-2002
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40(3); Income Tax Act
(2003)180CTR(Mad)174; [2003]262ITR129(Mad)
R. Kumar, Adv. for ;T.N. Seetharaman, Adv.
ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. The question of law referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for our consideration under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 in relation to the assessment of the assessee for the assessment year...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Vs. Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture
Himachal Pradesh
Jun-07-2006
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 7, 34, 34(1), 35 and 36; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 2
2006(2)ShimLC369
E.R. Kumar,; Sameer Parekh and; Yogita Dutta, Advs.
Deepak Gupta, J.1. The plaintiff Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited is a joint venture of the Government of India and Government of Himachal Pradesh formerly known as Nathpa Jhakri Power Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Tirupur Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar Finance Ltd.
Chennai
Nov-20-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]127TAXMAN392(Mad)
ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.The question of law referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for our consideration under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 in relation to the assessment of the assessee for the assessment year 1980-81 reads...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »