Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r krishnamurti · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 17 1996

Canara Bank Vs. Official Assignee, Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-1996

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR1997SC2570; I(1997)BC616(SC); [1997]88CompCas690(SC); 1996(9)SCALE440; (1997)3SCC366

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V.R Krishnamurti

ORDERG.N. Ray, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 29.6.1995 passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in O.S.A. No. 134 to 136 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1993

The Union of India, and Others Vs. Rizwan International

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-1993

Subject : Customs

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Imports and Exports Act - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 31(2); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 25, 35(1) and 159; Imports (Control) Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR1993Mad336; 1993(42)ECC183; (1993)IMLJ569

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Krishnamurty, Adv.

ORDERSomasundaram, J.1. This Writ Appeal has been filed against the order in W.P. 10444 of 1992, issuing a 'Writ of Mandamus directing the appellants herein to issue a licence for the export of the goods to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2014

Mahindra World City Developers Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:04. 03.2014 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, Acting Chief Justice AND The Honourable Mr.Justice K.K.SASIDHARAN W.A.No.564 of 2010 & W.P.Nos.20492 of 2009, 1031 of 2012 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 1986

Rajkot Engineering Association and ors. and Vs. Union of India and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-31-1986

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40A, 40A(3), 44AA, 44AA(2), 44AB, 69D, 131, 132, 132(5), 139(1), 139(9), 139A, 140A, 142, 142(2A), 246, 246(2), 269C, 271, 271(1), 271A, 271B, 272, 272A, 272B, 273, 273A(A), 288 and 288(2); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 6G; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : (1986)54CTR(Guj)272; (1987)1GLR3; [1986]162ITR28(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamurti, Adv.-General

B.K. Mehta, J.1. Since common question of law and facts arise in these two petitions, we intend to dispose of them by this common judgment, though we will shortly set out the relevant facts and circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1992

Almonard (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1992)41ITD337(Mum.)

1. This is an appeal against the order of the CIT (Appeals) wherein he has confirmed the action of the Asstt. Commissioner (AC) (i) in respect of bringing to tax Rs. 20,00,000 though under different head...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2007

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Star Chemicals (Bom) (P) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-30-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)110TTJ(Mum.)753

1. As common issues are involved in these two appeals filed by the Revenue on 15th Dec, 2003 against the order of the learned CIT(A)-XXVIII, Mumbai dt. 16th Oct., 2003 in the case of the assessee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1956

Sadhuram Vs. Engineer Telegraphs

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-30-1956

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311(1) and 311(2); Posts and Telegraphs Manual Vol. II Regulations - Sections 12(B), 12C and 12(2)

Reported in : AIR1957MP52

Advocate for Respondent : M. Adhikari, Adv.

ORDERSen, J.bv1. This is a petition by Sadhuram under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for adirection in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 31-8-1955, removing him from serviceand for his reinstatement.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1963

Kalinga Tubes Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shanti Prasad JaIn and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-18-1963

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 9, 31, 81, 105C, 166, 172, 173, 255 to 259, 397, 397(1), 398, 399(1), 399(3), 402, 403 and 433; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1963Ori189

Advocate for Respondent : A.C. Mitra, ;B.N. Duttarai, ;S. Roy Choudhuri, ;R.N. Misra and ;G. Das, Advs.

Misra, J.1. AHO. 13/61-- This appeal arises out of an application by Sri Shanti Prasad Jain under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter caned the Act). As there are large...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1985

State Vs. Kailash Chandra Agarwalla and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-07-1985

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 10(7), 16, 16(1), 20 and 20AA; Evidence Act - Sections 154; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 9; Criminal Proceduere Code , 1973 - Sections 313 and 360

Reported in : 1986(I)OLR160

Advocate for Respondent : K. Patnaik, Adv. for R. Mohanty and Sanjit Mohanty

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Both the respondents having been acquitted from the charge under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the present appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1972

Shri Ujjal Mandal Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-1972

Subject : Criminal

Acts : West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 - Sections 12(1); Constitution of India - Articles 22(4) and 32

Reported in : AIR1972SC1446; 1972CriLJ916; (1972)1SCC456; [1972]3SCR165; 1972(4)LC614(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Chakraborty and G.S. Chatterjee, Advs.

K.K. Mathew, J. 1. This is an application under Article 32 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus and for the release of the petitioner who is alleged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial