Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r krishnamoorthy · Page 1 of about 460 results (0.197 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 06 2012

Arulmigu Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam Vs. the Hindu Religious and Cha ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-06-2012

Subject : Family

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 6(20), 6(18), 46(iii), 55, 27, 116(2), 86; Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Institutions (Officers and Servants) Service Rules, 1964 - Rules 14, 5-A; Constitution of India - Section 226

Advocate for Respondent : Shri.V.S.Sethuraman, Adv.

This Writ Petition is a third round of litigation between the priests and the employees on the one hand and Arulmigu Shri Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam represented by its Hereditary Trustee on the other hand over the fixation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1998

Murugesa Naicker and Two Others Vs. the Special Tahsildar, Land Acquis ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-30-1998

Subject : property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 -- Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 16, 18, 28, 48, 50 and 55; Constitution of India -- Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC293

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy,;Senior Counsel for Mr. M.S. Govindarajan and;Mr. V. Rajavelu, Special Govt. Pleader for Land Acquisition

ORDER1. In all the above writ petitions the challenge is only with regard to acquisition of lands for development of a new satellite town near Madras known as Maraimalai Nagar by the Madras Metropolitan Development Authority...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2002

Reeta Sahney Vs. University of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-08-2002

Subject : ServiceProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 32, 226, 226(1A), 367 and 372; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(42); Indian Contract Act - Sections 202; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Constitution Law; Administrative Law; Public Law; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)432; 97(2002)DLT687

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Adv.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indian the grievance of the petitioner, namely Smt. Reeta Sahney, is that she has been unfairly and illegally passed over for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 30 1997

K.V. Shanmugam and Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rule 39; Constitution of India - Article 226; Forest (Conservation) Rules, 1981 - Rule 4; Central Act, 1986 - Sections 8; Forest (Conservation) (Amendment) Rules, 1993 - Rule 24-A(6)

Reported in : AIR1997Mad338; 1997(2)CTC431; (1998)IMLJ417

Advocate for Respondent : N.R. Chandran and ;R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Counsels for ;K. Ramu and Addl. Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. Since common questions involved in these writ petitions, the same may be disposed of by the following order.2. In W.P. No. 8505 of 1995 the petitioner has approached this Court to issue a writ of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2005

Viswapriya Financial Services and Securities Limited Rep. by Its Direc ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ;Reserve Bank of India Act in 1997 - 45IA, 45N (2), 45-IA (1), 45-IA (6) and 45-IA (7); ;Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas670(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Counsel for ;T. Poornam and ;P. Neelakantan, Advs.

ORDERD.Murugesan, J.1. The petitioner company was incorporated on 13.5.91 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. As the petitioner company is a Non Banking Financial Company, in terms of the amendment to the Reserve Bank...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1998

Seaways Shipping Ltd. Having Its Office at Ii Floor, Rahmat Manzil, 51 ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-13-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14,19(1)and 226; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 -- Sections 28, 34(1), 42(1), 42(3), 111 and 133; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 -- Sections 123; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC318

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.L. Somayaji,;Senior Counsel, for M/s. Aiyar and;Dolia Adv.,;Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy,;Senior Counsel, for M/s. Rangarajan and;Prabhakaran Adv.,;Mr. Habibullah Badsha,;Senior Counsel, for M/s. M. Se

ORDER1. This judgment shall govern writ petition Nos.9469 and 9470 of 1998 as the parties are common and also the controversy involved. Common petitioner herein is a company registered under the Companies Act which carries its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2003

Mrs. A. Sreedevi, Represented by Her Power of Attorney Agent Vs. the C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-23-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ200

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Senior counsel for P. Subba Reddy in W.P.17186/2003 for 3rd respondent, ;K. Ramanath Reddy, Adv. W.P. 15952/2003 for 4th Respondent, ;Srinath Sridevan, Adv. for R-3 in W.P. 15952/2

1. By consent of all the parties and in view of urgency in deciding the issue one way or other writ petitions themselves are taken up for final disposal. Since all the three writ petitions relate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2000

Reserve Bank of India Centre Office Center-i World Trade Centre, Mumba ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-03-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 226

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC173

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. Geenasenan, Adv.

ORDERJudgement Pronounced by N.K. Jain, J.1. This writ appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge made in W.M.P. No.21536 of 1999 in W.P.No.13216 of 199 dated 21.9.1999, allowing the respondent in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2001

Dr. Devendra Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, Ripon Buildi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2001

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12; Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 79 and 256 (3); M.C.M.C. Act - Sections 256 (1), (2) and (3)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4823; (2001)2MLJ10

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.L. Somayaji, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. R. Ramanlal, Adv., ;Mr. N.R. Chandran, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. R. Gowthama Narayanan, Adv. and ;Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. R. Gandhi, ;S

ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This Contempt Application has been filed for punishing the respondents for non compliance and wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 3.8.2000 in W.A. No.1171 of 2000, despite the receipt of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1999

Psg College of Arts and Science and Etc. Vs. Registrar, Bharathiyar Un ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : T.N. Private Colleges Regulation Act, 1976 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999Mad293

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Adv. in W.P. 7516/98, ;C. Chinnaswamy, Sr. Counsel and ;M. Rathinam, Govt. Adv.

ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. In W. P. No. 10499 of 1996, petitioner seeks issuance of writ of certiorarifiled mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned Proceedings of respondent, namely, his Proceedings No. 15843/A1/95...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial