Advanced Search Results

Arulmigu Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam Vs. the Hindu Religious and Cha ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 6(20), 6(18), 46(iii), 55, 27, 116(2), 86; Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Institutions (Officers and Servants) Service Rules, 1964 - Rules 14, 5-A; Constitution of India - Section 226

Advocate for Respondent : Shri.V.S.Sethuraman, Adv.

This Writ Petition is a third round of litigation between the priests and the employees on the one hand and Arulmigu Shri Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam represented by its Hereditary Trustee on the other hand over the fixation...

Murugesa Naicker and Two Others Vs. the Special Tahsildar, Land Acquis ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 -- Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 16, 18, 28, 48, 50 and 55; Constitution of India -- Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC293

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy,;Senior Counsel for Mr. M.S. Govindarajan and;Mr. V. Rajavelu, Special Govt. Pleader for Land Acquisition

ORDER1. In all the above writ petitions the challenge is only with regard to acquisition of lands for development of a new satellite town near Madras known as Maraimalai Nagar by the Madras Metropolitan Development Authority...

Reeta Sahney Vs. University of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 32, 226, 226(1A), 367 and 372; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(42); Indian Contract Act - Sections 202; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Constitution Law; Administrative Law; Public Law; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)432; 97(2002)DLT687

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Adv.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indian the grievance of the petitioner, namely Smt. Reeta Sahney, is that she has been unfairly and illegally passed over for the...

K.V. Shanmugam and Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Rule 39; Constitution of India - Article 226; Forest (Conservation) Rules, 1981 - Rule 4; Central Act, 1986 - Sections 8; Forest (Conservation) (Amendment) Rules, 1993 - Rule 24-A(6)

Reported in : AIR1997Mad338; 1997(2)CTC431; (1998)IMLJ417

Advocate for Respondent : N.R. Chandran and ;R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Counsels for ;K. Ramu and Addl. Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. Since common questions involved in these writ petitions, the same may be disposed of by the following order.2. In W.P. No. 8505 of 1995 the petitioner has approached this Court to issue a writ of...

Seaways Shipping Ltd. Having Its Office at Ii Floor, Rahmat Manzil, 51 ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14,19(1)and 226; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 -- Sections 28, 34(1), 42(1), 42(3), 111 and 133; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 -- Sections 123; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC318

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.L. Somayaji,;Senior Counsel, for M/s. Aiyar and;Dolia Adv.,;Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy,;Senior Counsel, for M/s. Rangarajan and;Prabhakaran Adv.,;Mr. Habibullah Badsha,;Senior Counsel, for M/s. M. Se

ORDER1. This judgment shall govern writ petition Nos.9469 and 9470 of 1998 as the parties are common and also the controversy involved. Common petitioner herein is a company registered under the Companies Act which carries its...

Viswapriya Financial Services and Securities Limited Rep. by Its Direc ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ;Reserve Bank of India Act in 1997 - 45IA, 45N (2), 45-IA (1), 45-IA (6) and 45-IA (7); ;Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas670(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Counsel for ;T. Poornam and ;P. Neelakantan, Advs.

ORDERD.Murugesan, J.1. The petitioner company was incorporated on 13.5.91 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. As the petitioner company is a Non Banking Financial Company, in terms of the amendment to the Reserve Bank...

Dr. Devendra Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, Ripon Buildi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12; Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 79 and 256 (3); M.C.M.C. Act - Sections 256 (1), (2) and (3)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4823; (2001)2MLJ10

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.L. Somayaji, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. R. Ramanlal, Adv., ;Mr. N.R. Chandran, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. R. Gowthama Narayanan, Adv. and ;Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. R. Gandhi, ;S

ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This Contempt Application has been filed for punishing the respondents for non compliance and wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 3.8.2000 in W.A. No.1171 of 2000, despite the receipt of...

Psg College of Arts and Science and Etc. Vs. Registrar, Bharathiyar Un ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : T.N. Private Colleges Regulation Act, 1976 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999Mad293

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Adv. in W.P. 7516/98, ;C. Chinnaswamy, Sr. Counsel and ;M. Rathinam, Govt. Adv.

ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. In W. P. No. 10499 of 1996, petitioner seeks issuance of writ of certiorarifiled mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned Proceedings of respondent, namely, his Proceedings No. 15843/A1/95...

V.V.P. Thangaraju Vs. K.V. Perumal Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1979)2MLJ469

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy

V. Balasubrahmanyan, J.1. These second appeals, three in number, raise a, common point. They arise out of suits for dissolution of partnership filed by a partner against his other partners. Two firms are sought to be...

Wockhardt Limited Vs. Hetero Drugs Limited,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 11A, 11A(7) and 24A; Drugs and Cosmetics Act

Reported in : (2006)1MLJ542; 2006(32)PTC65(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Sethuraman, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;V. Ramasubramanian, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ;K.M. Santhanagopalan, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Wockhardt Limited, a pharmaceutical company, appellant herein, is the holder of Process Patent, EMR and Drug Licence for the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparation, namely, Nadifloxacin 1% Cream.2. Hetero Drugs Limited, first respondent herein,...