Advanced Search Results

Manohar Lal Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)68TTJ(NULL)27

ORDERB. M. Kothari, A.M.The assessee has raised the following grounds in this appeal-'(1) That the learned lower authorities grossly erred in applying a gross profit rate of 11 per cent and in making a trading addition...

Dharambir Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 and 4; High Court Rules (Rules) - Rule 10; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2008(103)DRJ404

Advocate for Respondent : Dayan Krishnan, ; Gautam Narayan and ; Samrat Singh, Ad

ORDERS. Muralidhar, J.1. In a judgment dated 11th March, 2008 in a batch of cases (Crl.M.C. 1775/2006 Dharambir v. Central Bureau of Investigation), this Court issued certain directions in regard to supply of documents to the...

Agarwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.icon Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr. R.K. Yadav

$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 159/2018 & I.A. 4989/2018 AGARWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Sanjay Manchanda, Advocate. versus ICON BUILDCON PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants...

Chand Singh and Others Vs. The Narcotics Control Bureau

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 15.09.2010 passed by Sh. Sanjiv Jain, Special Judge, NDPS in S.C. No. N-48/08, convicting Appellant Chand Singh, Appellant Jasbir Singh and Appellant Narender Singh Jakhar for...

institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences Vs. Govt. of Nct of D ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Nayar

GITA MITTAL, J. “Salus Populi Est Suprema Lex” (Regard for public welfare is the highest law) 1. The present case reinforces the principle that adjudication on a factual situation by strict application of law would maximise...

Arjun Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

1 Criminal Appeal No.300/2008 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.300/2008 Arjun Singh and others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the...

Manohar Lal Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

"(1) That the learned lower authorities grossly erred in applying a gross profit rate of 11 per cent and in making a trading addition of Rs. 64,532. (2) That the learned lower authorities grossly erred in...

Bhagat Singh and Another Vs. M/S. Adharshila Towers (P) Ltd. and Anoth ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member 1. There is a magic in that little word, home, it is a mystic circle and surrounds comforts and virtues, never known beyond its hollowed limits. However, the customers are exasperated by...

State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) vs.ramtej

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:17. 10.2017 Judgment Reserved on:13. 09.2017 Crl. Rev. Petition 464/2017 * % + STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Amit Chadha,...

Kanwar Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd., Kanpur Nagar Vs. State of U.P. and O ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4 (1), 5A, 5A (2), 6, 6 (1), 9 and 55; Land Acquisition Rules, 1894 - Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 193 and 465

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1408; (1999)2UPLBEC877

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;A. Kumar, Adv.

O.P. Jain, J. 1. The above four writ petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment because the facts and the legal questions involved in them are identical. These writ petitions, which are a bunch...