Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r k shinde · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.091 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 13 1989

Shivlal Ghassuram Vs. Returning Officer, Gram Panchayat and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-13-1989

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats Act, 1981 - Sections 117; Panchayat Election and Co-option Rules, 1988 - Rule 72

Reported in : 1990MPLJ462

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Shinde, Adv. for respondent No. 4

ORDERT. N. Singh, J.1. The petitioner claims that he has been duly declared a Sarpanch as per Annexure P-2 but the Returning Officer acted illegally and arbitrarily in declaring Tularam, respondent No. 4, as the Sarpanch...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1991

Bhagwat Prasad Sharma Vs. Council of the Institute of Chartered Accoun ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-08-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Sections 21, 22, 22A(2) and 30; Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1964 - Regulations 31 and 32B(1)

Reported in : AIR1991MP378; 1992(0)MPLJ614

Advocate for Respondent : N.P. Mittal, ;J.P. Gupta and ;R.K. Shinde, Advs.

S.K. Dubey, J. 1. The petitioner has preferred this revision under Section 22A(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (Act XXXVIII of 1949), (for short, the 'Act') against an order dated 29-2-1988, passed by the Council...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 1986

Gangaram Bendil Vs. Rashmi Parihar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-25-1986

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81(3), 83 and 83(1)

Reported in : 1987MPLJ410

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. and ;B.K. Dubey, Advs.

K.M. Agarwal, J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal by the returned candidate is directed against an order passed on 18-8-1986 by the learned single Judge of this Court in a pending Election Petition No. 23 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 21 1978

Kushalchand Vs. Harlal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-1978

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81(3), 83, 83(2), 86, 86(1) and 86(5)

Reported in : AIR1978MP174

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Shinde, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

ORDERC.M. Lodha, J.1. This case comes up today for arguments on the preliminary objections filed by the respondent No. 1 Harlal on 6-12-1977 to the effect that the petition is liable to be dismissed on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1981

Kishanlal Vs. Kiranlal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-04-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 47; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 152 and 165

Reported in : AIR1982MP43

Advocate for Respondent : H.B. Mangal and ;R.K. Shinde, Advs.

M.D. Bhatt, J.1. This is iudgment-debtor's appeal against the lower appellate Court's order dated 3rd April, 1972, dismissing the appeal in the mat-ter of confirmation of sale by the executing Court, of his lands attached in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1991

Bharat Singh Vs. Kunwar Singh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1991

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 58

Reported in : AIR1991MP368; 1993(0)MPLJ547

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Shinde, Adv.

R.C. Lahoti, J. 1. The defendant in a suit for declaration of title and issuance of a mandatory injunction who succeeded fully from the trial court, but lost partially in the plaintiffs appeal before the lower...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1989

Pushpa @ Hempushpa Vs. Praduman Kumar Ojha

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-05-1989

Subject : FamilyLimitation

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 28(4); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 1990MPLJ509

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Shinde, Adv.

ORDERR.C. Lahoti, J.1. The trial Court has passed a decree of judicial separation between the parties, a Hindu spouse. The wife has come up in appeal. However, the office reports that the appeal is barred by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial