Advanced Search Results
Badri Prasad Vs. Satish Kumar Sharma
Rajasthan
Nov-22-1963
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 123(4); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2
AIR1964Raj184
R.K. Rastogi, Adv.
Chhangani, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 116A of theRepresentation of the People Act, 1951, (herein-after, to be referred to as the Act) by Badri Prasad,an unsuccessful election petitioner, against the orderof the Election...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Hindo Open Sugar Mills and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-17-1973
Civil
Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 18 and 18(1)
AIR1974Raj110; 1973()WLN557
R.K. Rastogi and; M.B.L. Bhargava, Advs.
Beri, C.J. 1. Seven petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were presented before learned Single Judge of this Court challenging the validity of the notification dated November 28, 1972, whereby the petitioners were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Jan-29-1954
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 228; Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 7
AIR1954Raj185
R.K. Rastogi, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 4 to 26
Sharma, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Sardar inder Singh and Krishi Sahkarini Samiti, Bhimnagar, through its Secretary, Satya Pal Singh, against the State of Rajasthan, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raghuvar Dayal Vs. Hargovind and anr.
Rajasthan
Sep-26-1957
PropertyCivil
Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115
AIR1958Raj287
R.K. Rastogi, Adv.
ORDERK.K. Sharma, J.1. This is an application for revision by the defendant Raghuvar Dayal against the judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge, Alwar in a suit under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLikhmi Chand and ors. Vs. Smt. Sukhdevi and ors.
Rajasthan
May-08-1970
FamilyProperty
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(2)
AIR1970Raj285; 1970(3)WLN225
R.K. Rastogi, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3
Jagat Narayan, C.J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs whose suit for grant of some reliefs in respect of a 'Nohra' and a 'Haveli' situated at Bidasar was dismissed by the Senior Civil Judge, Churn.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGram Panchayat Through Its Gram Pradhan, Smt. Siya Pyari W/O Dharm Pal ...
Allahabad
Dec-12-2006
Civil
2007(1)AWC847
A.K. Yog and R.K. Rastogi, JJ.1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar, Advocate, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vishnu Pratap, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3.2. According to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNidhi Dhamija vs.university Grants Commission and Ors
Delhi
Dec-12-2018
Education
Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Mr. A.C. Boxipatro, Mr. Vikram Jetly, Mr. Anil Soni, Mr. Abhinav Tyagi
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4160/2011 % 1. NIDHI DHAMIJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Karunesh Tandon, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadha Ballabh Haldiya and ors. Vs. Pushalal Agarwal and ors.
Rajasthan
May-25-1984
Constitution
AIR1986Raj88; 1985(1)WLN468
L.R. Mehta, Adv.
ORDER1. Sohan Nath Modi J., vide judgment dated the 27th August, 1973, made a reference as he had differed with the earlier judgment dated the 28th April, 1972 passed by J.P. Jain J., in S. B....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFahimur Rahman Siddiqui Son of Sri Nisar Ahmad Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...
Allahabad
Oct-12-2006
Civil
2007(1)AWC53
A.K. Yog and R.K. Rastogi, JJ.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the contesting respondents.2. In view of our judgment and order dated 26.9.2006 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 54400...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArun Kumar Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Dec-06-2006
Commercial
2007(1)AWC522
A.K. Yog and R.K. Rastogi, JJ.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel representing the respondents.2. The petitioner seeks to challenge the impugned order dated 15.11.2006 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »