Advanced Search Results

Bhoma Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 17, 18, 42 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1749

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Purohit, Adv.

P.C. Jain, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 21-6-1995 passed by the learned Special Judge N.D.P.S. Cases, Jodhpur whereby the accused-appellant Bhomaram was held guilty of the offence under Section 8 read...

Dhulji Vs. R.T.A., Udaipur and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 72; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1996Raj87

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Dave and; R.K. Purohit, Advs.

ORDERN.K. Jain, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 226 has been filed by Dhulji to restrain the R.T.A., Udaipur from considering any application and granting and issuing any permit on Banswara to Pratappur via Thikaria...

A.C. Saxena Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

W.P.No.14753/2008 10.1.2013: None for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1. Shri V.S.Shroti, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Vikram Jhori for respondent No.2. Challenging the action of the respondents in denying...

Hanuman Ram Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Terrorists and Disruptive Activities Act, 1985; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2000(4)WLC687; 2000(3)WLN135

Advocate for Respondent : G.K. Vyas and; Mahipal Vishnoi, Advs.

ORDERB.J. Shethna, J.1. The petitioner Hanuman Ram has filed this petition and prayed that the impugned order dated 17.2.2000 (Annex.9) be quashed and set aside. It is further prayed that the Review Committee be directed to...

Mazid Vs. Smt. Raj Kunwar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2009(3)WLN202

Vineet Kothari, J.1. Heard learned Counsels.2. This appeal has been filed by one Shri Mazid owner of the vehicle namely Truck No. RJG 2771 being aggrieved by the impugned award of MACT, Chittorgarh deciding MACT Case...

Brij Mohan Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

By The Court (Oral): 1. This review petition is reported to be time barred by 20 days. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the same is allowed....

M/S Electrothem (India) Ltd. Vs. Patel Vipulkumar Ramjibhai and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7222 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.16860 of 2012) M/s Electrotherm (India) Ltd. ….Appellant Versus Patel Vipulkumar Ramjibhai & Ors. …. Respondents...

Anwar Singh Son of Shri Tej Mal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Customs

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 7, 7(1) and 8; Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 3(1), 7(C) and 11; Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 13 and 67; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 22(5)

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3012; 1995(1)WLC634; 1994(2)WLN677

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Bhandawat, Additional Adv. General

J.R. Chopra, J.1. This Habeas Corpus petition has been filed by Anwar Singh, against his detention order Annx. 1 dated 17th June 1993, whereby he has ben ordered to be detained for a period of one...

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Laxmi Sharma and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1992ACJ895

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Purohit, Adv.

Milap Chand Jain, J. 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 110-D, Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Udaipur dated October 29, 1985 awarding compensation to the tune...

Union of India (Uoi) (the) Vs. Trustees of Major Maharaj Harisingh Ben ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Properties Act, 1952 - Sections 2F, 3, 4, 6, 6(1A), 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 8, 8(2), 8(3), 8(2A) and 8(2B); Defence of India Act, 1971 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24 and 24(1); Defence of India (Amendment) Act, 1977; Rajasthan Land Reforms and Acquisition of Land Owners Estate Act, 1963 - Sections 2F; Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Properties (Amendment) Ordinance, 1977; Arbitration Act, 1940; Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property (Amendment) Act, 1975; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 5A(1) and 5A(2); Constitution of India - Articles 217, 226 and 352

Reported in : AIR2005Raj250; RLW2005(3)Raj1878

Advocate for Respondent : L.R. Mehta and; R.K. Purohit, Advs.

ORDER:--35. The learned Single Judge has quashed the Annexure-12 having held that it also suffers from the vice of being non-speaking. In other words the final order of acquisition Annexure-12 does not contain reasons. On fair...