Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r k prasad · Page 1 of about 142 results (0.266 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 24 2000

M. Gopalakrishnan Vs. Canara Bank, Head Office, J.C. Road, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-24-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 19(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 5 (1)(2);Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947

Reported in : ILR2000KAR1359; 2001(2)KarLJ236

Advocate for Respondent : Sri T.R.K. Prasad, Adv.

ORDER1. Some people pay a heavy price for their honesty, integrity and devotion to duty. This case is one such example. After receiving appreciation letters from all quarters throughout his service, petitioner is now made to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1998

The Mangement of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Air Craft Division, Ba ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-17-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Section3(1)

Reported in : [1999(82)FLR435]; 1999(5)KarLJ148

Advocate for Respondent : Sri T.R.K. Prasad, Adv.

1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 20-1-1995 passed in CWC-3/FC/CR-9 of 1992 by the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Division III, Bangalore, the appellant has preferred this appeal.2. The appellant-Company is having its factory at Vimanapura,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2000

Federation of Canara Bank Employees and anr. Vs. Canara Bank

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-14-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ932Kant

Advocate for Respondent : T.R.K. Prasad, Adv.

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J. 1. The first petitioner is a Trade Union and second petitioner is an employee of Canara Bank, They have filed this writ petition seeking to quash Annexure L dated January 31, 1994...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 2000

Banshidhar Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-24-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act - Sections 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120B, 182, 419, 420, 467 and 468; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 177, 197 and 482; Bihar Coal Control Order, 1956 - Sections 3

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Prasad, A.P.P.

Prabhat Kumar Sinha, J.1. This application has been filed by Bansidhar Singh, the then District Magistrate, Madhopura, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying therein for quashing the entire proceeding in criminal case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2011

Mehtab Singh Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms.Anjana Gosain, Adv.

1. The petitioner was appointed as a constable with the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) in the year 1990 and after various postings he was posted at the CISF Unit, HFCL Barauni. On 13.1.1997 along with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2007

Panchanan Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-24-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act - Section 19; ;West Bengal State Health Service Act, 1990 - Sections 14(4) and 21(1); ;Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; ;West Bengal Medical Education Service (Recruitment to Teaching Administrative Posts) Rules, 1997 - Rule 1(2); ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(3)CHN337

Advocate for Respondent : Swapan Kumar Paul, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, A.C.J.1. These two applications under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India were heard together as the point involved herein is practically the same.2. Both these applications are directed against the common order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2001

Ko and in India Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Excise, Hyderabad and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2001

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110(1), 50 and 51; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 110(2), 226, 300A and 800A; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34 and 34(1); Companies Act - Sections 237

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD496; 2002(1)ALT79; 2002(145)ELT38(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Ramulu, SC for Central Government

S.R. Nayak, J.1. In both the writ petitions, the validity and legality of the seizure of certain goods intended to be exported to Libya is assailed. Hence both the writ petitions were clubbed and heard together...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1999

G.M.S. Prabhu Vs. Canara Bank

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-05-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Canara Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976

Reported in : ILR1999KAR4500; (2001)IIILLJ354Kant

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. T.R.K. Prasad

ORDERH.L. Dattu, J.1. An Officer of the respondent Canara Bank is before this Court aggrieved by the orders framed by the Disciplinary Authority imposing certain punishments as provided in the Regulations of the Canara Bank Officer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2000

Akilesh Lumani and Others Vs. Principal, Sir C.R. Reddy Autonomous Col ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-18-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 14 and 26(1); University Grants Commission Regulations, 1985 - Regulation 3(5)

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD630; 2000(4)ALT568

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T. Rajendra Prasad, SC for Andhra University

ORDERR. Ramanujam, J. 1. Can thestudents of an Autonomous College, who have failed to attend 75% of the total lectures, claim eligibility to appear at the final examination on the ground that the college has not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2018

Anil Kumar Verma vs.the Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2018

Subject : Education

$~3, 54 & 68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 05.2018 + W.P.(C) 3569/2018 & C.M. No.14077/2018 ANIL KUMAR VERMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Arun Banerjee, Adv. with Mr.R.K. Prasad,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial