Advanced Search Results

Bapuji Grameena Vikas Samithi (R) Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka State University Act, 1976 - Sections 53 and 56; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164; Representation of People Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1997Kant55; 1997(1)KarLJ632

Advocate for Respondent : Hemanth R. Chandanagouder for ;R.H. Chandanagoudar, Adv. and ;N.B. Viswanath, Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. This petition is filed under Art. 226 of Constitution of India whereby the petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the respondents not to cancel affiliation...

Basavaraj M. and Others Vs. the Karnataka State Pharmacy Council, Bang ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 10(3), (4) and (5), 11, 12, 12(1) and (2), 13, 14, 18, 30(2), 31 and 32; Education Regulation for Diploma Course in Pharmacy, 1991 - Regulations 2, 7and 9

Reported in : AIR2001Kant239

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Bharama Gowda, Government Pleader

ORDER1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri R.H. Chandanagoudar and the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3.2. By these petitions, the petitioners have sought the following reliefs.-(i) Quashing of the endorsements dated...

Parashuram Rao Anantha Rao Pise Vs. Pratibha Parashuram Rao Pise

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 19, 21, 24, 28 and 118; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 27, Rule 41; Mysore Civil Courts Act; Indian Divorce Act - Sections 55; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 - Sections 34 and 34(1)

Reported in : AIR1975Kant31; ILR1974KAR95; 1974(1)KarLJ265

Advocate for Respondent : T.J. Chouta, Adv.

1. This appeal is fifed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order passed in M. C. No. 8 of 1972 on the file of the Civil...

Miss M.G. Haldipurkar Vs. Karnatak University

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1996KAR2471; 1996(5)KarLJ473

Advocate for Respondent : R.H. Chandangoudar, Adv.

ORDERHari Nath Tilhari, J.1. The petitioner in this case, who has been a law graduate and who has completed her Course of LLB in 1988, has filed this petitionunder Article 226 of the Constitution of india...

M. Anantha Mugeraya Vs. Karnataka Land Army Corporation, Bangalore and ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR2002KAR3539; 2002(4)KarLJ309

Advocate for Respondent : R.H. Chandanagoudar, Adv.

ORDERH.L. Dattu, J. 1. Petitioner had joined the services of Karnataka Land Army Corporation ('Corporation' for short), as Assistant Task Force Commander some time in the year 1972. During the year 1983, he was promoted as...

Krishnabai Vs. Krishnarao Janantrao Desai and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 18A, 54, 57 and 151 - Order 13, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1995Kant172; ILR1994KAR1468; 1994(4)KarLJ384

Advocate for Respondent : R.H. Chandanagoudar, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 23-10-1990 passed by the Principal Munsiff, Gadag on I.A. No. I in F.D.P. 23/89. By the said order the Principal Munsiff, Gadag allowed I.A.I. filed by...

Dr. Sandhya Upadhyaya Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 142(1) and 144; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 38(4) and 39

Reported in : 1998(4)KarLJ178

Advocate for Respondent : Sri A.V. Srinivasa Reddy, Additional Government Advocate, ;Sri R.H. Chandanagoudar and ;Sri N.B. Bhat, Advs.

ORDER1. The petitioners are the students of postgraduate degree course in medical sciences conducted by the respondent-Karnataka University. They had joined the course subsequent to the academic year 1992-93. They have approached this Court for seeking...

Vice Chairman, Village Panchayat, Maranbeed Vs. Channabasappa B. Gaddi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Village Panchayats and Local Boards Act, 1959 - Sections 31(2); Karnataka General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 3(37) and 3(42); Constitution of India - Article 217; Karnataka Village Panchayat Election of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman Rules, 1959

Advocate for Respondent : W.K. Joshi, Adv. and ;R.H. Chandanagoudar, Govt. Adv.

V.S. Malimath, Ag. C.J. 1. This Appeal is by the Vice-Chairman of the village Panchayat, Maranbeed village, challenging the order made by the learned single Judge in Writ petn. No. 515/82, which decision has since been...

Hanumaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 6, 7 and 7(3); Karnataka Village Offices Abolition (Amendment) Act, 1978

Reported in : ILR1987KAR550

Advocate for Respondent : R.H. Chandanagoudar, High Court Government Adv. for R-1 and R-2

Hakeem, J.1. These petitions have come up before us on a reference made by Murlidher Rao, J, by his order dated July 30, 1985.2. Is order to appreciate the question raised in these petitions, it is...

K.G. Kallappa and Co. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1980 - Sections 3, 8(2), 8(3), 65 and 65A; Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 254(2); Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act; Essential Commodities Act; Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966

Reported in : ILR1988KAR2722

Advocate for Respondent : N. Santosh Hegde, Adv. General, ;R.H. Chandanagoudar, HCGA, ;N. Devadas, HCGP, ;S.G. Sundaraswamy, ;K. Balakrishna, ;B.G. Sridharan, ;R. Gopal, ;R.U. Goulay and ;S.G. Bhat, Advs.

ORDERRama Jois, J.1. In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners who are traders in agricultural produce have challenged the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1980 (Karnataka Act No. 17/1980)...