Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r gandhi · Page 1 of about 605 results (0.379 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 30 2012

Suriya Kala Vs. the State.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), - Section 397, 401, 457, 451; Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act - Section 4(1)(aaa), 4(1)(A), 14(4)

PrayerCriminal Revision case filed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 Cr.P.C. praying this Court to call for the records relating to the order dated 19.03.2012, made in Cr.M.P.No.1540 of 2012, on the file of Judicial Magistrate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2001

The Special Tahsildar (Lao), Land Acquisition Ii, Tamil Nadu Housing B ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9, 18 and 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ657

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Gandhi, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. R.G. Narendiran

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. Special Tahsildar (LAO) Land Acquisition-II, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Madras-35 is the appellant in the above appeal. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Subordinate Judge in L.A.O.P.No. 13 of 1993 dated,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2004

A. Shanthi Vs. the General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Marke ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)4MLJ568

Advocate for Respondent : R. Gandhi, S.C. ; for V.P. Sengottuvel, Adv. R.5 in W.P. No. 126/2003, ; Poornima Viswanathan, for R.1 to R.3 and ; K.M. Vijayan, S.C. ; for B. Saravanan, Adv. for R.4

V. Kanagaraj, J.1. Both the Writ Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the first one in W.P.Nos.126 of 2003 praying to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring the selection made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 1996

C. David Thampi Dhas Vs. N.M. Christian College, Marthandam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-19-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 30(1) and 31;

Reported in : (1997)IILLJ911Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Addl. Govt. pleader, R. Gandhi and ;Ms. B. Saraswathi Prasad, Advs.

ORDER1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is, whether the inipugned order refusing to reemploy the petitioner and continue his service till May 3 1, 1996 but relieving him from duties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2005

Vattavila Sree Bhadrakali Educational Society, Rep. by Its President, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2005

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act 1973 - Sections 2(6), 2(7), 4, 5,6, 8, 9, 11 and 12; ;Constitutional of India - Articles 25(2), 26 and 29(2) to 30(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 41 Rule 27; Evidence Act - Sections 115

Reported in : 2005(3)CTC328; (2005)3MLJ47

Advocate for Respondent : S. Senthilnathan, Addl. Govt. Pleader (CS) for for Respondents 1 and 2 and ;R. Gandhi, Senior Counsel for ;K. Ravichandra Babu, Adv.

M. Thanikachalam, J. 1. The plaintiff society, who was successful in getting a decree as prayed for in O.S. No. 5934/1987 on the file of the VIII Additional City Civil Judge, Madras, failed to sustain the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2009

Life Insurance Corporation of India Rep. by Its Regional Manager (L an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-08-2009

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 45; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 18 and 19

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ181

Advocate for Respondent : R. Gandhi, Sr. Counsel for ;R.G. Narendhiran, Adv.

P. Jyothimani, J.1. The writ petitions are directed against the award of the Insurance Ombudsman dated 30.8.2005, by which the claim of the second respondent in W.P. No. 46518 of 2006, who is the petitioner in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2011

Kumar.P Vs. Sarubala R.Thondaiman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6 Rule 16; Representation of Peoples Act 1951 - Sections 81 read with 100(1)(d)(iii)(iv), 129; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 49(O); Constitution of India - Article 324; Representative of People Act - Section 77

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.R.Gandhi And Ors.

ORDER1. This is an application filed by the first respondent in the Election Petition (ELP No.4/2009) under Order 14 Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Order 6 Rule 16 of CPC. Election Petition No.4 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2005

Dr. P. Shanmugharaj, Vs. Subramaniam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-20-2005

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC334; 2007ACJ545

Advocate for Respondent : Saravanan, Adv. for R1 to R3 in CMA 1677/2003, ;R. Thiagarajan, Senior Counsel for ;L.G. Sahadevan, Adv. for 2nd Respondent in CMA 532/2003 and ;R. Gandhi, Senior Counsel for ;R.G. Narendran, Adv. Res

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Since the above appeals and Revision arise out of the very same accident that had taken place on 19-12-1994, they are being disposed of by the following common Judgement. 2. Claimants in M.C.O.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 1997

John Paulraj A.P. Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education Rep. by Its ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-03-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 41

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ628Mad

Advocate for Respondent : R. Gandhi, Senior Counsel for ;M. Kandasamy, Adv. for Respondent No. 3 and ;N. Paul Vasanthakumar, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Heard both the parties.2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank in the Writ Appeal.3. The above Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated March...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2006

E.A. Thirugnanam Vs. V.P. Rajagopal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-01-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16C

Reported in : 2006(1)CTC809

Advocate for Respondent : R. Gandhi, Sr. Counsel for ;K. Ravichandrababu, Adv.

K. Mohan Ram, J.1. The defendant in O.S. No. 474 of 1988 on the file of the Sub-Court, Erode, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 08.11.1991 passed therein has filed the above appeal.2. For...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial