Advanced Search Results

Balraj Singh Malik Vs. Supreme Court of India Through

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.F. Nariman, Mr. Sushil Kr. Jain, Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, Mrs. Sunita B. Rao, Mr. Atulesh Kumar

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8327 OF 2011 % Pronounced on: 13.2.2012 BALRAJ SINGH MALIK ....PETITIONER Through: Md. Izhar Alam and Mr. M.P. Singh, Advocates with Petitioner in person. VERSUS...

Venture Global Engineering Vs. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1, 1(2), 2, 2(1), 2(2), 2(3), 2(4), 2(5), 3, 5, 9, 17, 34, 44, 45, 48, 48(1), 48(3), 52, 53 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 108, 110 and 111A; Companies Rules

Reported in : AIR2008SC1061; 2008(2)ALD46(SC); 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)416; 2008(1)ARBLR137(SC); 2008BusLR102(SC); (2008)1CompLJ224(SC); 2008(1)CTC348; JT2008(1)SC468; 2008(4)MhLj579; (2008)2MLJ; 2008AIRSCW667; 2008(2)ICC693; 2008(1)SCALE214; (2008) 4 SCC 190

Advocate for Respondent : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv., ; Subhash Chandra Birla and ; Subrat

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted. 2. Appellant - Venture Global Engineering (in short 'VGE'), a company incorporated in the United States of America with its principal office at 33662, James J Pampo Drive, Fraser, Michigan, USA...

State of A.P. Vs. Smt. Prameela Modi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 8; ;Constitution of India - Article 226 ; ;Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 - Sections 14; ;Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972; Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Act 1923 - Sections 13; ;Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2006(11)SCALE38

Advocate for Respondent : Harish N. Salve, ; R.F. Nariman, ; L.N. Rao, Sr. Advs., ;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. This case has a chequered history. This is the sixth in series of litigation between the State of A.P. and the respondents herein. Both parties are in the legal battle field...

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Lalit Somdatta Nagpal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 7, 10A, 21, 21(3), 21(4), 23, 23(1) and 23(2); Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7, 7(1), 7A(1)(9), 9, 10 and 10A; Petroleum Storage and Distribution Act, 2000 - Sections 3; Essential Commodities (Special Provisions) Act, 1981 - Sections 7, 12A, 12AA and 12AA(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Arms Act; Sales Tax Act - Sections 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(5), 262 to 265, 438 and 468; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 364, 302, 420 and 506(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 82

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1678; JT2007(3)SC466; 2007(3)SCALE49; (2007)4SCC171

Advocate for Respondent : Harish N. Salve, ; R.F. Nariman, ; Mukul Rothagi, Sr. Adv

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Five Special Leave Petitions, of which three have been filed by the State of Maharashtra, one by Lalit Somdatta Nagpal and one by Kapil Nagpal, have been taken up for hearing together as...

Mmrda Officers Association Kedarnath Rao Ghorpade Vs. Mumbai Metropoli ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR298; JT2005(6)SC194; (2005)2SCC235

Advocate for Respondent : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv., ; A.S. Bhasme and ; Sunil Kumar Jain

ORDERArijit Pasayat, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. Though many points were urged in support of the appeal relating to the eligibility of respondent No. 2 to be appointed as Chief, Town and...

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Universal Exporters and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3AAA; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 12A(5)

Reported in : JT1997(8)SC70; 1997(6)SCALE53; (1997)7SCC531; [1997]Supp4SCR49; [1997]107STC187(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : R.F. Nariman, Adv.

ORDER1. Section 3AA and Section 3AAA of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948, at the relevant time read thus:3-AA. Rate and point of tax in respect of certain goods - subject to the provisions of...

Ewanlangki-e-rymbai and Elaka Jowai Secular Movement Vs. Jaintia Hills ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : United Khasi Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment and Succession of Chiefs and Headmen) Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(1); Jowai District as an autonomous District the Jowai Autonomous District Act, 1967; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 118, 213 and 213(1); Chotanagar Tenancy Act, 1908 - Sections 7, 8 and 76; Assam Autonomous Districts (Constitution of District Councils) Rules, 1951; United Khasi Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment and Succession of Chiefs and Headmen) Rules; United Khasi Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment and Succession of Chiefs and Headmen) Regulations

Reported in : AIR2006SC1589; JT2006(4)SC139; 2006(3)SCALE562; (2006)4SCC748

Advocate for Respondent : R.F. Nariman and ; P.K. Goswami, Sr. Advs., ; H.S. Thangkhiew

B.P. Singh, J.1. These appeals by special leave are directed against the common judgment and order of the Gauhati High Court dated 21st July, 2003 in Writ Petition (C) No. 6541 of 2001 [WP (C) No....

Central Bank of India vs.suman Chadha & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Shri. R.F. Nariman

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 531/2015 CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anuj Jain, Advocate with Mr.Ujjwal Narain, Manager (Law). versus SUMAN CHADHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS...

M/S. B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(6), 40, 47, 53, 73, 162, 245, 246, 248, 258, 266, 269(3), 276, 286(3), 292, 293, 298, 301, 302, 303 and 304; Lotteries(Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12(3); Government of India Act, 1935; U.P. Unauthorized Lottery(Prevention) Act, 1995 - Sections 8;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294A; English Lotteries Act, 1823; Common Wealth of Australian Constitution Act, - Sections 21, 73 and 92; Lotteries and Amusements Act, 1976; Lotteries and Art Unions Act, 1901-1929;

Reported in : AIR1999SC1867; JT1999(3)SC431; 1999(3)SCALE171; [1999]2SCR1111

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.F. Nariman, Shri. Rajeev Dhawan

A.P. Misra, J. 1. Special leave granted in all the special leave petitions. We are witnessing in this case exhibition of Federalism in true spirit. Contrary to the usual pouring in of citizen's writ petitions for...

R.S.D.V. Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shree Valllabh Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilLabour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21 and 92 - Order 7, Rule 10; Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 4(1); Bihar Hindu Religious Trust Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1993SC2094; JT1993(1)SC617; 1993(1)SCALE262; (1993)2SCC130; 1993Supp(3)SCC518

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.F. Nariman

ORDER1. Special Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 24th October, 1991. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant R.S.D.V. Finance Company Private Limited (hereinafter referred...