Advanced Search Results

State of Madras Represented by the Special Tahsildar for Land Acquisit ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1976)1MLJ31

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Desikan

M.M. Ismail, J.1. A.S. No. 173 of 1970 arises out of O.P. No. 203 of 1966 while A.S. No. 174 of 1970 arises out of O.P. No. 19 of 1968, both on the file of the...

Natarajan Vs. Chandmull Amarchand by Power-of-attorney, K. Milopchand ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1971)1MLJ474

K.S. Venkataraman, J.1. These two appeals are against a common order dated 14th November, 1966 of the learned Subordinate Judge of The Nilgiris, in proceedings in execution of the decree in O.S. No. 167 of 1955....

Natesan Vs. Surya Bagadhur Shah

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1957)2MLJ586

Panchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This is a petition filed by one Natesan, the landlord, for revising and setting aside the Order of the District Judge, Tirunelveli, in M.C. No. 8 of 1955, dismissing that petition for revising...

Ramaswami Pillai Vs. Sankara Mudaliar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Debt Laws; Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938 - Sections 8; Madras Agriculturists Relief (Amendment) Act, 1948

Reported in : AIR1951Mad635

Advocate for Respondent : K. Bhashyam Ayyangar, ;A.C. Sampath Ayyangar and ;R. Desikan, Advs.

Subba Rao, J.1. This appeal raises some interesting points of law under the Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1938 as amended by the Madras Act XXIII [23] of 1948. The facts are fully and accurately stated by...

S.O. Krishna Aiyar Vs. S.V. Narayanan Alias S.V. Doraiswami and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1951Mad660; (1951)IMLJ187

Advocate for Respondent : R. Desikan, Adv.

ORDERBalakrishna Ayyar, J.1. What the learned Judge has reallydone is to write a second judgment reversinghis first because on fuller argument and further consideration he thought that the view hehad first taken was wrong. This is...

Union of India (Uoi), Owning the South Indian Railway by the General M ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 16, 17 and 17(1)

Reported in : AIR1952Mad808; (1952)1MLJ703

Advocate for Respondent : R. Desikan, Adv. and ;Govt. Pleader

ORDERSubba Rao, J. 1. This is an application for issuing a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order of the Additional Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Madras. 2. The respondents, S.P. Nataraja Sastrigal and S. Padmanabha Rao,...

Nallathambi Alias Venkatachalam Chetty and ors. Vs. Perumal Chetty and ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Tenancy Law; Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 3(2)

Reported in : AIR1953Mad813; (1953)IMLJ786

Advocate for Respondent : R. Desikan, Adv.

Rajamannar, C.J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit, O. S. No. 55 of 1945, filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Salem by 22 persons who were occupying separate lands in the village...

R. Subbaraya Gounder (Died) and ors. Vs. K.R. Eswaramoorthy Gounder

Court : Chennai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34; Madras Indebted Agriculturists (Temporary Relief) Act, 1954 - Sections 5; Madras Indented Agriculturists (Repayment of Debts) Act, 1955 - Sections 8; Madras Indebted Agriculturists (Temporary Relief) Ordinance, 1953 - Sections 5; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 14 and 19

Reported in : AIR1963Mad202

Advocate for Respondent : R. Desikan, Adv.

Ganapatia Pillai, J. 1. This appeal is preferred by the first defendant in O. S. No. 54 of 1958 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. That suit was brought by the...

Ramaswami Naicken Vs. Viswanatha Chetty Alias Subramania Chetty and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 69 and 70

Reported in : AIR1950Mad343

Advocate for Respondent : A. Viswanatha Aiyar, ; O.V. Baluswami and ; R. Desikan, Advs.

Viswanatha Sastri, J.1. The Courts below have differed on the question whether the plaintiff, here respondent, is entitled to reimbursement of a sum of Rs. 1007 together with interest subsequent to the suit, from defendant 1,...

Narayanan Chettiar Vs. Rathinasami Padayachi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1938 - Sections 19 and 20; Madras Agriculturists' Relief (Amendment) Act, 1948; Debt Law

Reported in : AIR1953Mad421; (1952)2MLJ859

Advocate for Respondent : R. Desikan, Adv.

Rajamannar, C.J.1. There is no reason whatever to Interfere with the order passed by the learned District Munsif. The petitioner is the decree-holder. The respondent who was the first judgment-debtor made an application on 3-6-1949 under...