Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r d dave · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 24 2008

In Re: Panchmahal Steel Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-24-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(1), 391(2), 392, 392(1), 393, 393(1) and 394(4); Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1); Bombay Stamps Act; Contract Act; Sales of Goods Act; Sections 5; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 130; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI) - Sections 5

Reported in : [2009]90SCL253(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : R.D. Dave,; S.N. Shelat and; Iqbal Shaikh, Advs.

K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioner Company has filed this petition under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 to obtain sanction of this Court to the modified scheme of compromise and/or arrangement between the petitioner and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2006

Azad Ice Factory Vs. Guj. Industrial Investment Corpn.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-05-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Gujarat Public Moneys [Recovery of Dues] Act, 1979 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4) and 4

Reported in : AIR2007Guj29

Advocate for Respondent : R.D. Dave, Adv.

R.S. Garg, J.1. The appellant-plaintiff M/s. Azad Ice Factory, a registered partnership firm had purchased certain property. M/s. Krishna Ice Factory from whom the property was purchased, at the time of the purchase of the property...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2009

Indian Bank Vs. Alltune Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-12-2009

Subject : Banking

Acts : Reserve Bank of India directives/Bank Rules; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2009Guj121

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.D. Dave

Jayant Patel, J.1. The short facts of the case appear to be that the petitioner Bank preferred O.A. No. 107 of 1995 against the respondent for recovery of the amount of Rs. 93,10,429.33 with the running...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 2004

Board Opinion Vs. Nanikram Sobhraj Mills Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-12-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : ULC Act; ;Sick Industrial Companies Act - Sections 18(2), 20 and 529; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Reported in : [2005]59SCL403(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : D.S. Vasavada and; R.D. Dave, Advs. for Respondent No. 1 and;

K.A. Puj, J.1. Since all these petitions and application are in relation to the same Company, namely, Nanikram Sobhraj Mills Limited and since the prayer in all these Company Petitions is for winding up of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2008

Bhagudeo Flour Mills P. Ltd. Vs. O.L. of Disha Agro Industries Ltd. an ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-29-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 32E; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 529, 529A, 530, 531, 531A and 531(1)

Reported in : [2009]148CompCas828(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : J.S. Yadav,; Pranav G. Desai,; R.D. Dave,;

K.A. Puj, J.1. Since the subject-matter of both these applications is somewhat similar and both these applications deal with the same property, they are heard together and the same are being disposed of by this common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2005

Yuvraj Prithvirajsinhji S/O Maharao Madansinhji Vs. Maharani Rajendrak ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-02-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Properties Act - Sections 52; Stamp Act; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5 and 9; Bombay Land Revenue Code - Sections 135(D); Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2006Guj84

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Vakil and; R.D. Dave, Advs. for Respondent No. 1,;

C.K. Buch, J.1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties in detail and as per the oral request extended by them, we have accepted written submissions in brief for convenience and in the background of intrinsic...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2009

Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2009

Subject : BankingProperty

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 29(1) and 29(2); Transfer of Property Act; Companies Act; Bombay Land Revenue Code

Reported in : (2009)1GLR816

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mehta

Jayant Patel, J.1. The short facts of the case appear to be that the petitioner is a financial institution governed by the provisions of State Financial Corporations Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2011

Firozbhai Ganibhai Sodha Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-03-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value =...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2005

Essar Steel Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-28-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 78, 80, 87, 100, 101, 101(2), 102(2), 102(3), 103, 104, 106, 107, 192A, 391 and 642(1)

Reported in : [2006]130CompCas123(Guj); (2006)5CompLJ83(Guj); [2005]59SCL457(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Sandeep Singhi, Adv. for Singhi & Co.,; Mihir Joshi, Sr. Adv. and;

K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioner, namely, Essar Steel Limited has filed this petition under Section 78 and 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 before this Court seeking following prayers :-(a) That the reduction of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2008

Ol of Gujarat Ministeel Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-05-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446, 529, 529A and 530; Recovery of Debts Act - Sections 17, 18, 19(22) and 34; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 154 and 179

Reported in : [2008]143CompCas580(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Adv. and; S.S. Panesar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,;

K.A. Puj, J. 1. The Official Liquidator has filed this report praying for the direction to Central Bank of India, GSFC & GIIC to refund to his office a sum of Rs. 3,06,23,526/-, Rs. 24,25,368/- and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial