Advanced Search Results
Canara Bank Vs. Arihant Industries Ltd.
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-07-2000
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433
[2002]110CompCas70(P& H)
R.C. Setia and; Munisha Gandhi, Advs.
J.S. Khehar, J. 1. The instant is a winding up petition filed by Canara Bank (along,with others) under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'). It is the case of the petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHira Lal and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-31-1991
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(1992)101PLR241
R.C. Setia, Addl. A.G.
N.C. Jain, J.1. This judgment of mine would dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 12268 of 1989, 310 to 312, 2440, 2634, 2635, 3277, 3279 to 1990, 3000 of 3003, 4552, 4742, 6032, 6181, 6227 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBir Singh Kadian Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-26-1994
Labour and Industrial
(1996)ILLJ172P& H; (1995)109PLR379
R.C. Setia, Addl. A.G.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J 1. Are the petitioners who have been granted promotion vide order dated November 30, 1992, with retrospective effect entitled to the relixation of their pay, pension, gratuity and the payment of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Manohar Singh Vs. Smt. Rattan Kaur
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-10-2004
Tenancy
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13 and 13(2)
(2004)138PLR572
R.C. Setia, Senior Adv. and; Amit Jhanji, Adv.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is tenant's petition filed under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity, the Act) challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below holding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.S. Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-07-1996
Property
Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 - Sections 15(2); Haryana Urban Development Authority (Disposal of Plots) Regulations - Regulation 13
(1997)116PLR67
R.C. Setia, Sr. Adv. and; Sidarth Sarup, Adv.
V.K. Bali, J.1. By this order, two connected writ petitions bearing Nos. 6320 and 6319 of 1995 are being disposed of as common questions of law and fact are involved in both these petitions. The facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarbans Kaur Vs. Jagir Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-09-1999
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 23, Rule 1
(2000)125PLR626
R.C. Setia, Sr. Adv. and; Rohit Pathak, Adv.
R.L. Anand, J.1. This is a second appeal against the order dated 27.5.1988 passed by Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, who allowed the appeal of the plaintiff-respondents Jagir Singh and others and gave them the direction to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShamsher Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-23-1993
Civil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227
(1994)106PLR50
R.C. Setia, Addl. S.A.O.
Ashok Bhan, J.1. Two questions, one of the fact and the other of law arise for determination in this case. The question of fact is - Is there in fact a policy decision taken by Govt....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Central Excise and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-16-1997
Excise
Central Excise and Customs laws (Amendment) Act, 1991; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Act, 1962; Contract Act - Sections 72; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 56A; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226
(1998)118PLR364
Rajesh Gumbar, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and; R.C. Setia
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. These appeals are directed against the order dated May 14, 1987 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.P. No. 3120 of 1985. Oswal Oil and Soap Industries and Anr. v. Customs, Excise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent: Mr. I.K. Mehta Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana Thro ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jun-30-2014
Land Acquisition
C.W.P. No.4464 of 1991 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.4464 of 1991 Date of Decision.30.06.2014 Adarsh Sabzi Mandi Samiti and others ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunish Sarangal and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-21-2013
Land Acquisition
Crl. Misc. not M-3818 o”1. .IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-3818 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 21st , 2013 Munish Sarangal and others ...Petitioners Versus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »