Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r c setia and · Page 1 of about 95 results (0.091 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 07 2000

Canara Bank Vs. Arihant Industries Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-07-2000

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433

Reported in : [2002]110CompCas70(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Setia and; Munisha Gandhi, Advs.

J.S. Khehar, J. 1. The instant is a winding up petition filed by Canara Bank (along,with others) under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'). It is the case of the petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1991

Hira Lal and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-31-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (1992)101PLR241

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Setia, Addl. A.G.

N.C. Jain, J.1. This judgment of mine would dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 12268 of 1989, 310 to 312, 2440, 2634, 2635, 3277, 3279 to 1990, 3000 of 3003, 4552, 4742, 6032, 6181, 6227 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1994

Bir Singh Kadian Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-26-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1996)ILLJ172P& H; (1995)109PLR379

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Setia, Addl. A.G.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J 1. Are the petitioners who have been granted promotion vide order dated November 30, 1992, with retrospective effect entitled to the relixation of their pay, pension, gratuity and the payment of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 10 2004

Manohar Singh Vs. Smt. Rattan Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-10-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13 and 13(2)

Reported in : (2004)138PLR572

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Setia, Senior Adv. and; Amit Jhanji, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is tenant's petition filed under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity, the Act) challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below holding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1996

R.S. Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-07-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 - Sections 15(2); Haryana Urban Development Authority (Disposal of Plots) Regulations - Regulation 13

Reported in : (1997)116PLR67

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Setia, Sr. Adv. and; Sidarth Sarup, Adv.

V.K. Bali, J.1. By this order, two connected writ petitions bearing Nos. 6320 and 6319 of 1995 are being disposed of as common questions of law and fact are involved in both these petitions. The facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1999

Harbans Kaur Vs. Jagir Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-09-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 23, Rule 1

Reported in : (2000)125PLR626

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Setia, Sr. Adv. and; Rohit Pathak, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J.1. This is a second appeal against the order dated 27.5.1988 passed by Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, who allowed the appeal of the plaintiff-respondents Jagir Singh and others and gave them the direction to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1993

Shamsher Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-23-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : (1994)106PLR50

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Setia, Addl. S.A.O.

Ashok Bhan, J.1. Two questions, one of the fact and the other of law arise for determination in this case. The question of fact is - Is there in fact a policy decision taken by Govt....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1997

Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-16-1997

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Customs laws (Amendment) Act, 1991; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Act, 1962; Contract Act - Sections 72; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 56A; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : (1998)118PLR364

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh Gumbar, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and; R.C. Setia

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. These appeals are directed against the order dated May 14, 1987 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.P. No. 3120 of 1985. Oswal Oil and Soap Industries and Anr. v. Customs, Excise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2014

Present: Mr. I.K. Mehta Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana Thro ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-30-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

C.W.P. No.4464 of 1991 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.4464 of 1991 Date of Decision.30.06.2014 Adarsh Sabzi Mandi Samiti and others ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2013

Munish Sarangal and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Crl. Misc. not M-3818 o”1. .IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-3818 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 21st , 2013 Munish Sarangal and others ...Petitioners Versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial