Advanced Search Results
Mala Ramesh Pherwani of Bombay Vs. Ramesh Pherwani of Bombay
Mumbai
Jun-26-1991
Civil
Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19(1)
1991(93)BLJR784; 1991(3)BomCR116; I(1993)DMC475; 1991(1)MhLj1188
R.C. Nichani, Adv.
V.P. Tipnis, J.1. This appeal, which was admitted on 21st June, 1991, was taken up for final hearing forthwith with the consent of the parties as the issue raised in the appeal was capable of being...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. Panigrahi (Mrs.) Vs. Mrs. Sameera W/O Amzad I. Sayyed and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-01-2004
Family
Contract Act; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; Islamic Law
2005(1)MhLj1017
R.C. Nichani, Adv., ;i/b., Sunita Poddar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;J.M. D'Silva, Adv. for respondent Nos. 3 and 4
V.C. Daga, J.1. This appeal takes exception to the order dated 13th October, 2003 passed in Notice of Motion No. 2569 of 2003 in Small Cause Suit No. 3225 of 2003 by the Bombay City Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalkrishna Arjun Jadhav and Others Vs. Thane Municipal Corporation and ...
Mumbai
Apr-11-1997
Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 88 and 89; Maharashtra Town Planning Scheme Rules, 1974, Rules 17 and 19
1998(1)BomCR299; 1997(3)MhLj260
R.S. Apte and ;Miss R.C. Nichani, Advs.
ORDERM.B. Shah, C.J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. In our view, there is no substance in this petition. Notices dated 19th February 1997 under section 89 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jogani and Sachdev Developments Vs. Lawrence D'Souza and Ors.
Mumbai
Dec-15-2005
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9A - Order 2, Rule 3 and 3(2); Bombay Court Fees Act - Sections 6; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1) and 33; Constitution of India - Articles 120, 226 and 227; Presidency Small Causes Act - Sections 41; Small Cause Courts Act - Sections 41(1)
2006(3)ALLMR81; 2006(2)MhLj369
R.C. Nichani, Adv.
S.U. Kamdar, J.1. By the present petition the order dated 9-8-2005 passed by the City Civil Court on a preliminary issue of jurisdiction in L. C. Suit No. 2974 of 2004 is challenged. Some of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›