Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r c agrawal · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.143 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 1999

Mukesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. Raj Kumar Agarwal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-07-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Counciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(2) and 11(6)

Reported in : AIR2000MP231; 2000(1)MPLJ209

Advocate for Respondent : Abhay Gohil, Adv.

ORDERS.C. Pandey, J.1. This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (henceforth 'the Act').2. Honourable the Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court had made a scheme for appointment of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1994

Ravishankar and anr. Vs. Viith Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 1994(0)MPLJ783

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDER1. On the question of scope, applicability and ambit of Order 39, Rule 4, Civil Procedure Code, two learned Judges of this Court (B. C. Varma, J. and K. M. Agarwal, J.) having differed in their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1979

Smt. Sayeeda Begam and anr. Vs. Ashraf HussaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-1979

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 22; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 120 and 137

Reported in : AIR1980MP12; 1980MPLJ46

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Agrawal, Adv.

Malik, J.1. The question which has been referred to the Division Bench for answer is this: Whether the provisions of Order 22 read with Section 141 Civil P. C. would apply to proceeding initiated under Order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 1965

Smt. Umri Bai Vs. Chittar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-22-1965

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1966MP205

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Agrawal, Adv.

Shiv Dayal, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter called the Act). In 1961 the appellant made an application under Section 10 of the Act for judicial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2005

Shivkumar B. Nair Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Jun-07-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(3)SLJ210CAT

1. Aggrieved by the order of Disciplinary Authority imposing the penalty of dismissal from service and that of Appellate Authority in not deciding his appeal the applicant had preferred the present O.A. He had sought for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1985

Raghib Nasim and anr. Vs. Naseem Ahmed and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-17-1985

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 2(1985)ACC233

R.C, Agrawal, J.1. These two First Appeals From Order have been preferred Under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act. Appeal No. 490 has been filed by the New India Assurance Company Limited, whereas Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 1998

Ram Autar Garg (Decd) Through Lrs Vs. General Manager (Personal Divisi ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-11-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2)

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1833; (1999)ILLJ1294All

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Singh and ;K.L. Grover, Advs.

M.L. Singhal, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 14.6.1988 (Annexure-23), passed by the Deputy General...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1998

Deo NaraIn Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-14-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 4K and 6N; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC351

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C.

R.H. Zaidi, J.1. By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the Award of Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2005

Netram Vs. Vijay Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-09-2005

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304, 337 and 379

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT94

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Kaurav, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ; Amrita Ruprah, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the claimant for enhancement of compensation aggrieved by an award dated 21-1-2004 passed by Second Addl. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur in Claim Case No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2002

M. Saran and Etc. Etc. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-22-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Road Release Orders; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 91, 161, 227 and 228

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3635; 2002(4)MPLJ173

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Patel, Sr. Standing Counsel

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. This batch of criminal revisions being interconnected were heard together and disposed of by this common order. For the sake of clarity, I will refer to the distinguishing facts in the cases where...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial