Advanced Search Results

Dhani Devi and ors. Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2006)ACC666

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.B. Agarwal

J.C.S. Rawat, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and order dated 10.7.2003 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Nainital in...

Kalawati Devi and ors. Vs. Narayan Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2006ACJ2813; 2005(2)AWC1373(UHC)

Advocate for Respondent : R.B. Agarwal, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and award dated 3.9.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Champawat.2. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that appellants filed a claim...

Radha Devi and ors. Vs. Narayan Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1369(UHC)

Advocate for Respondent : R.B. Agarwal, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and award dated 3.9.2004, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Champawat.2. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that appellants filed a claim...

Sushila Devi and ors. Vs. ShaukIn Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 166 and 173

Reported in : 2006ACJ1961

Advocate for Respondent : R.B. Agarwal, Adv.

P.C. Verma and B.S. Verma, JJ.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 6.11.1998 passed in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 119 of 1995...

Food Corporation of India Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1988]69STC374(All)

Advocate for Respondent : V. Upadhyay, Adv.

Brijesh Kumar, J.1. In this bunch of writ petitions, the petitioner, namely, the Food Corporation of India, who claims to perform governmental function for the purposes of constituting national pool of foodgrains, objects to the levy...

Sonali Trading Co. Vs. Sales Tax Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 10(10); Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 69

Reported in : [2003]129STC97(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

I.M. Quddusi, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant Sri A.R. Masoodi and the learned Standing Counsel.2. This revision has been filed against the judgment and orderspassed in second appeal Nos. 53 of 2000 and 60...

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. R.B. Agarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 134(1) and 136; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1966SC1135; 1966(0)BLJR656; 1966CriLJ815; [1966]3SCR462

Gajendragadkar, C.J. 1. If an accused persons is convicted by the trial Court, but on the appeal to the High Court is acquitted, can the State move the High Court under Art. 134(1)(c) of the Constitutions...

Bolabhai Hirabhai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 76, 84, 106, 299 and 302; Evidence Act. - Sections 4, 105, 137 and 154; Mental Health Act -Sections 91, 91(3) and 94; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 328 and 329

Reported in : (2000)3GLR242

Advocate for Respondent : K.P. Raval, APP for Respondent No.1

J.N. Bhatt, J.1. Whether, the appellant-accused is guilty of offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IP Code), or his act falls within the exception under section 84 of the IP Code, is...

Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Chawla Vs. State of Up and Ors

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. We have heard Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Chawla-the petitioner appearing in person. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the State respondents. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Medical Officer in the Medical and Health Department, Government of...