Advanced Search Results
Keshav Prasad Pathak Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-09-2002
Service
2002(2)AWC1485; [2002(94)FLR407]; (2002)3UPLBEC2108
Pushpendra Singh, S.C.
M. Katju and Rakesh Tiwari, JJ. 1. Heard Sri A. P. Sahi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pushpendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 16.2.2001 (Annexure-7...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. H.S. Rai and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Mar-16-2001
Service
2001(2)AWC1167; (2001)2UPLBEC1603
Pushpendra Singh, S.C.
M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri Umesh Narain Sharma learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for the State Government and Shri Pushpendra Singh for the U. P. Public Service Commission.2. The petitioners are all working...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUdai and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-05-2003
CivilConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
2004(1)AWC641; (2004)2UPLBEC1775
Pushpendra Singh, S.C.
M. Katju and Umeshwar Pandey, JJ.1. Through this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners challenge the Impugned orders dated 16.10.2003 (Annexures-3, 4 and 5 to the writ petition) passed by respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-22-2001
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 226(3)
(2001)2UPLBEC1599
Pushpendra Singh, Adv.
Sudhir Narain, J.1. The petitioners have sought to quash the order dated 6.2.2001 whereby the appointments of the petitioners to the post of Junior Engineer have been cancelled by the Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation Department, U.P. Lucknow, respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParesh Kumar Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-16-2003
Service
Uttar Pradesh Transport Service Rules, 1990 - Rule 5 and 5(1); Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation and Function) (Amendment) Regulation, 1994
2003(1)AWC787
Pushpendra Singh, Adv. and ;S.C.
M. Katju and Prakash Krishna, JJ.1. The present writ petition has been filed for a writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to forthwith consider the petitioner for promotion as Assistant Regional Transport Officer against vacancies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Kumar Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
May-25-2001
Constitution Service
Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, Dependants of Freedom Fighters and Ex-servicemen) Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, ; Dependants of Freedom Fighters and Ex-servicemen) (Amendment) Act, 1997; Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 32 and 33; Constitution of India - Article 254 and 254(1); Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, Dependants of Freedom Fighters and Ex-servicemen) (Amendment) Act, 1999
2001(3)AWC1972; [2001(90)FLR473]; (2001)2UPLBEC1855
Kripa Shanker Singh, Adv. and ;Pushpendra Singh, S.C.
S.R. Singh, J.1. The question that begs consideration in this writ petition is whether the petitioner, who suffered impairment due to locomotor disability to the extent of 20%, is entitled as 'physically handicapped' candidate, to get...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Prakash Dixit Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-10-2002
Service
2002(3)AWC1800; [2002(94)FLR458]; (2002)2UPLBEC1946
Pushpendra Singh, S.C.
M. Katju, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. Sri Pushpendra Singh has appeared for the respondent No. 3. 2. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 22.2.2000...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaushal Kishore Vs. U.P. Public Services Commission and ors.
Allahabad
May-25-2001
Service
(2001)3UPLBEC2142
Pushpendra Singh, Adv.
A.K. Yog, J.1. Heard Sri L.K. Dwivedi, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Shri Pushpendra Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 shall be deemed sufficiently served...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushil JaIn (Ms.) and ors. Vs. Bhel Shiksha Mandal
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-13-2004
Service
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 1(3) and 2
(2004)IIILLJ1092MP; 2004(3)MPLJ532
Pushpendra Singh, Adv.
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. In these writ petitions teachers and BHEL Shiksha Sangh have prayed for the relief of quashment of order (P-1) dated November 9, 2000 passed by H.E. Education Society by which circular dated January...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Rajodevi and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-11-2003
Service
Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 - Rule 5
2004(3)AWC2080
Sandeep Mukherjee, S.C. and ;S.C.
R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Ashwani Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sandeep Mukherjee learned standing counsel for the State.2. In this petition the prayer has been made for quashing the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »