Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: pushpendra singh · Page 1 of about 152 results (0.038 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 09 2002

Keshav Prasad Pathak Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-09-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1485; [2002(94)FLR407]; (2002)3UPLBEC2108

Advocate for Respondent : Pushpendra Singh, S.C.

M. Katju and Rakesh Tiwari, JJ. 1. Heard Sri A. P. Sahi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pushpendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 16.2.2001 (Annexure-7...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2001

Dr. H.S. Rai and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-16-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1167; (2001)2UPLBEC1603

Advocate for Respondent : Pushpendra Singh, S.C.

M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri Umesh Narain Sharma learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for the State Government and Shri Pushpendra Singh for the U. P. Public Service Commission.2. The petitioners are all working...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2003

Udai and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-05-2003

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC641; (2004)2UPLBEC1775

Advocate for Respondent : Pushpendra Singh, S.C.

M. Katju and Umeshwar Pandey, JJ.1. Through this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners challenge the Impugned orders dated 16.10.2003 (Annexures-3, 4 and 5 to the writ petition) passed by respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 2001

Ashok Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-22-2001

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226(3)

Reported in : (2001)2UPLBEC1599

Advocate for Respondent : Pushpendra Singh, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. The petitioners have sought to quash the order dated 6.2.2001 whereby the appointments of the petitioners to the post of Junior Engineer have been cancelled by the Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation Department, U.P. Lucknow, respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2003

Paresh Kumar Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-16-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Transport Service Rules, 1990 - Rule 5 and 5(1); Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation and Function) (Amendment) Regulation, 1994

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC787

Advocate for Respondent : Pushpendra Singh, Adv. and ;S.C.

M. Katju and Prakash Krishna, JJ.1. The present writ petition has been filed for a writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to forthwith consider the petitioner for promotion as Assistant Regional Transport Officer against vacancies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 2001

Shiv Kumar Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-25-2001

Subject : Constitution Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, Dependants of Freedom Fighters and Ex-servicemen) Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, ; Dependants of Freedom Fighters and Ex-servicemen) (Amendment) Act, 1997; Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 32 and 33; Constitution of India - Article 254 and 254(1); Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, Dependants of Freedom Fighters and Ex-servicemen) (Amendment) Act, 1999

Reported in : 2001(3)AWC1972; [2001(90)FLR473]; (2001)2UPLBEC1855

Advocate for Respondent : Kripa Shanker Singh, Adv. and ;Pushpendra Singh, S.C.

S.R. Singh, J.1. The question that begs consideration in this writ petition is whether the petitioner, who suffered impairment due to locomotor disability to the extent of 20%, is entitled as 'physically handicapped' candidate, to get...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2002

Vijay Prakash Dixit Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1800; [2002(94)FLR458]; (2002)2UPLBEC1946

Advocate for Respondent : Pushpendra Singh, S.C.

M. Katju, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. Sri Pushpendra Singh has appeared for the respondent No. 3. 2. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 22.2.2000...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 2001

Kaushal Kishore Vs. U.P. Public Services Commission and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-25-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2001)3UPLBEC2142

Advocate for Respondent : Pushpendra Singh, Adv.

A.K. Yog, J.1. Heard Sri L.K. Dwivedi, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Shri Pushpendra Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 shall be deemed sufficiently served...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2004

Sushil JaIn (Ms.) and ors. Vs. Bhel Shiksha Mandal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-13-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 1(3) and 2

Reported in : (2004)IIILLJ1092MP; 2004(3)MPLJ532

Advocate for Respondent : Pushpendra Singh, Adv.

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. In these writ petitions teachers and BHEL Shiksha Sangh have prayed for the relief of quashment of order (P-1) dated November 9, 2000 passed by H.E. Education Society by which circular dated January...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2003

Smt. Rajodevi and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-11-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 - Rule 5

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2080

Advocate for Respondent : Sandeep Mukherjee, S.C. and ;S.C.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Ashwani Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sandeep Mukherjee learned standing counsel for the State.2. In this petition the prayer has been made for quashing the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial