Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: purnima sethi · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.041 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 2008

Mukesh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-01-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 320 and 322; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 368, 372, 374(2), 378, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 397, 397(3) and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 423; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 and 384 - Order 41, Rules 11, 17, 19 and 72; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 141

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT201; 2008(105)DRJ303

Advocate for Respondent : Manoj Ohri, Adv.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. We are concerned with the rampant manipulation and misuse of the statutory right to appeal by convicts who quite palpably take recourse to filing of appeals with the sole objective of defeating justice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2012

Nizam @ Titto ..A-4 Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-27-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Richa Kapoor

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : 4th January, 2012 DECIDED ON : 27th January, 2012 + CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.852, 813 and 891/2009 CRL.APPEAL- 891/2009 JAMAL MIRZA ..... A-1 AND...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2009

In Re: Ge Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 250A and 391, 393 and 394; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959; Constitution of India - Articled 56 and 79

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas52(Delhi); 162(2009)DLT31

Gita Mittal, J.1. This joint application has been filed under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, by the applicant-companies seeking directions of this Court to dispense with the requirement of convening the meetings of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 2013

Real Lifestyle Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Turner Asia Pacific Ventures ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Rishi Aggarwala, Ms. Malavika Lal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 30, 2013 Decision on: February 22, 2013 Co. Appl. No. 2076 of 2012 in Co. Pet. No. 20 of 2011 REAL LIFESTYLE BROADCASTING PVT....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 1984

Pritam Singh Dhingra Vs. Ambadipudi Uma Sambamurthy

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-1984

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 37, Rule (1)

Reported in : 1984(7)DRJ150

Yogeshwar Dayal, J.(1) This revision petition is directed against an order of learned Commercial Sub-Judge, Delhi, dated 22nd February, 1983, whereby the learned Commercial Sub-Judge, accepted an application filed by the plaintiff Under the provisions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2005

Manjit Singh Sawhney Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 142 and 226;

Reported in : 120(2005)DLT156; 2005(82)DRJ459

Advocate for Respondent : Purnima Sethi, Adv.

Gita Mittal, J.1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking payment of Rs. 1,18,275.00 with interest on account of compensation for the injuries and loss suffered by him in the 1984 riots.The 31st...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2005

Sanjeev Verma Vs. Distt. and Session Judge and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-29-2005

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2006(86)DRJ221

Advocate for Respondent : Purnima Sethi, Adv.

Markandeya Katju, C.J.1. This writ petition has been filed against the impugned judgment passed by the learned Single Judge dated 30.9.2005 by which he dismissed the writ petition.2. Heard the counsel for the parties and perused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial