Advanced Search Results

Pukhraj Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1989CriLJ2251; 1989WLN(UC)432

ORDERG.K. Sharma, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dt. 27th April, '83, by which, the Judicial Magistrate, Bhinmal took cognizance against the petitioner Under Sections 467, 468, 419/109 and 120B, I.P.C.2. To understand...

Jai Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2002(1)WLN44

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. The above mentioned appeals are being decided by this common judgment as both have been preferred against the same judgment and order dated 27.5.1987 passed by the learned Special Judge, Essential Commodities...

Kesrimal and anr. Vs. Dalichand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 42, 63 and 69

Reported in : AIR1959Raj140

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Chandra, Adv.

ORDERI.N. Modi, J.1. This is a revision by the plaintiffs. Kesrimal and another in a suit for money against' the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Balotra dated 28-5-1954 by which he upheld the dismissal...

Amichand Valanji and ors. Vs. G.B. Kotak and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 40 and 44; ;Defense of India Rules, 1962; Gold Control Rules; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1966Bom70; (1965)67BOMLR234

Advocate for Respondent : K.H. Bhabha and ;A.B. Diwan, Advs., i/b., P.G. Gokhale, Attorney

Tambe, J.(1) This is a petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India, wherein the vires of the Gold Control Rules, contained in part XIIA of the Defence of India Rules, have been challenged. In...

Laxman Vs. Champalal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1979WLN(UC)264

Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Jodhpur 31-1-1976.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case giving rise to this appeal are that...

Metallizing Equipment Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Incom ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)70TTJ(NULL)365

ORDERP.M. Jagtap, A.M.This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), Jodhpur, dated 20-10-1993.2. Ground No. 2 relates to the addition of Rs. 10,000 as a result of reduction in cost of...

Pukhraj Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1970WLN518

L.S. Mehta, J.1. The deceased Raghunath Darji, aged about 50 years, was incharge of a water-hut, opened by one Nanoolal Sukhwal, P.W. 16, In Merta city for offering free water to padestrians. He was drawing Rs....

L.Rs. of Magna Vs. Amar Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyContract

Reported in : RLW2007(3)Raj2200

Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This second appeal is against the judgment and decree passed by the trial court dated 15.11.1976 in Civil Original Suit No. 329/1969 by which the trial court...

Pukhraj Vs. Sheshmal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173, 195 and 476; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 211

Reported in : AIR1961Raj231; 1961CriLJ691

Advocate for Respondent : Madhusudan Narain, Adv. for; Pukhraj, Adv.

ORDERL.N. Chhangani, J. 1. The Additional District Magistrate, Jodhpur has made this reference with a recommendation that the offence under Section 211 I. P. C. for which Parasmal is being prosecuted having been committed in relation...

Tarachand and ors. Vs. Kesrimal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3 and 59; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 34, 58, 59 and 100

Reported in : AIR1973Raj123

Advocate for Respondent : Pukhraj Singhi, Adv.

Kan Singh, J. 1. This is a plaintiffs' appeal directed against the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge, Sirohi dated 28-4-1969 dis-missing the plaintiffs' suit for recovery of money on the foot of...