Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: puja sharma · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 09 2021

M.c. Mehta Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-09-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 ITEM NO.1 Court No.1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION PIL-W S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 13029/1985 M.C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2019

Meena Sharma Vs. The State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2019

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : M. Shoeb Alam

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 9183 of 2019 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No 2035 of 2019) Meena Sharma .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Jammu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2016

Devinder Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab Through Cbi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.190 OF2003Devinder Singh & Ors. … Appellants Vs. State of Punjab through CBI … Respondent [With Criminal Appeal No.352/2016 @ SLP (Crl.) Nos.3324/2016 @...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 17 2017

Re:mohit Chaudhary, Advocate Vs. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE1IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) NO.5 OF2017IN RE : MOHIT CHAUDHARY, ADVOCATE JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. A Noble Profession. An Officer of the Court. An Advocate-on-Record having...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 1991

M.L. Sharma Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-30-1991

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1992)ACC20; 1992ACJ443

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Vasudeva, A.A.G.

R.S. Mongia, J.1. This judgment will dispose of F.A.O. Nos. 377, 378 and 379 of 1989, as these arise out of the same award dated 31st October, 1988, of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh, (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2019

Vinod Kumar Vs. Ashok Kumar Gandhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-05-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Puja Sharma

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3793 OF2016VINOD KUMAR … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR GANDHI … RESPONDENT(S) With C.A. No.8972-8973/2017, C.A.No.6063 of 2019(arising out of SLP(C) No.19965/2017), C.A.No.6064 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2002

Commissioner of Central Excise, Madras Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2002LC279(SC); 2002(142)ELT513(SC); (2002)10SCC545

Advocate for Respondent : Sonu Bhatnagar, ; Vandana Chugh, ; Puja Sharma, ;

ORDER1. The appeals are pressed by the Revenue only insofar as they relate to quantity discount and free units.2. Quantity discount, to put it simply, works thus: a dealer receives from the assessee a stated extra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2001

Smithkline Beecham Plc and Another Vs. Mr. Sunil Singhi and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-12-2001

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 7, Rule 10 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 3 & 4; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62(2); Copyright Act, 1956; Marks Act - Sections 55(1);

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)849; 91(2001)DLT461; 2001(2)RAJ446

Advocate for Respondent : H.A. Ahmadi, ; Mr. Ramesh Kerwani and ; Ms. Puja Sharma

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. By way of a present objection, the Defendant No.2 has challenged the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. The plaintiffs have filed this suit for the grant of a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2025

Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Ason versus Union of India Through Sec ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2397

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Aishwarya Bhati, Mrs. Archana Pathak Dave A.S.Gs, Ms. Himanshi Sakya, Ms. Drishti Saraf, Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Ms. Aakansha, Ms. Ruchika Bhan, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, Mrs. Aakanksha Kaul, Ms. Sunanda Shukla, Mrs. Suman Lata Katiyar

[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2397 : 2025 INSC 573Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Ason. v. Union of India Through Secretary & Ors. (Miscellaneous Application No. 1290 of 2022 In Writ Petition (Civil) No. 876 of 1996) 25...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial