Advanced Search Results

Jindal Strips Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7(1), 7(2), 15, 15(1), 16, 18(2), 25, 25(1), 46 and 68; ;General Clauses Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 19(1) and 226; ;Food Controller under the Beans, Peas and Pulse (Requisition) Order, 1917

Reported in : 1992(62)ELT301(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Partha Behari Mukherjee and ;Prantosh Mukherjee, Advs.

Hazari, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for an order that:(a) A writ and/or in the nature of mandamus be issued commanding the respondents, their servants...

Rajesh Sharma and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 110 and 124; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 174 and 175

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN604,2004(175)ELT82(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Prantosh Mukherjee, Adv.

Soumitra Pal, J.1. The Court: The petitioner is engaged in the business of export and import and had been allotted an importer code number by the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Guahati, Assam. The petitioner,...

Daga Nylomet Private Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CustomsExcise

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Section 11; ;Central Excise Act, 1944

Reported in : 1993(67)ELT270(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Roychoudhury and ;Prantosh Mukherjee, Advs.

Ruma Pal, J.1. The dispute in this case is whether the machinery imported by the petitioners is a textile machine. The petitioners say that the machine imported is a textile winding machine and is covered by...

M/S. Indian Charge Chrome Vs. Commissioner of Customs,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(135)ELT593Tri(Kol.)kata

1. All the appeals arise out of the same impugned Order of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Bhubaneswar-I and as such are being disposed of by a common Order. Vide the impugned Order, the...

Smt. Surjit Kaur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1998(59)ECC71

Satyabrata Sinha, J.1. The petitioner by reason of this application questions an order dated 25th November, 1996 passed by the respondent No. 2 whereby and whereunder the properties of the petitioner were confiscated purported to be...

Sukumar Mondal Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1990)(48)ELT56Tri(Kol.)kata

1. These five appeals captioned above are directed against the Order No. 12/Cus/WB/1985 dated 9th August, 1985 passed by the Collector of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal, Calcutta, whereby he had absolutely confiscated 18205 pieces of readymade...

M/S. Bharat Petroleum Vs. C.C.E., Calcutta -i

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The prayer in the application is for dispensing with the condition of redeposit of duty amount of Rs. 3,98,94,726.00 (rupees three crore ninety eight lac ninety four thousand seven hundred twenty six only) and penalty...

Balmer Lawrie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2005)(184)ELT162Tri(Kol.)kata

1. This appeal has been filed against the order passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Calcutta on 14th December, 1993.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that M/s. Balmer Lawrie and Co....

Abdul Kader Hamdan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CustomsCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 104 and 108; ;Wild Life Prevention Act

Reported in : (1994)2CALLT392(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Anjan Mukherjee and ;Prantosh Mukherjee, Advs.

Mukul Gopal Mukherji, J.1. This, Habeas Corpus application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by one Abdul Kader Hamdan, brother of the detenu Omar Hamdan, who has been detained at Dum...

Pratic Kumar Sen Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1) and 8B; ;Constitution of India - Article 22, 22(4) and 22(5)

Reported in : (1995)2CALLT376(HC),99CWN953

Advocate for Respondent : Promodranjan Roy, ;Prantosh Mukherjee, ;P.K. Bose, ;Abhra Mukherjee and ;P. Mukherjee, Advs.

Arun Kumar Dutta, J.1. By this Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner-Detenu-Pratic Kumar Sen in Jail (hereinafter referred to as detenu) has challenged the order of his detention under Section 3(1)...