Advanced Search Results
Lt. Cdr. M.C. Kendall Vs. S. Chandrasekhar
Karnataka
Aug-30-1991
Civil
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 20
ILR1991KAR4142; 1992(1)KarLJ604
B.S. Subbaramaiah, Adv. for R-1 and ;B.S. Pranesh Rao, Adv. for R-3
N.D.V. Bhat, J. 1. This Appeal is preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 13-8-1981 passed by the Principal Civil Judge, Bangalore District, Bangalore in O.S.No. 61/1980.2. The facts relevant for the disposal of this appeal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Muniswamappa Vs. P. Chennakrishnappa
Karnataka
Jan-13-1971
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 48
AIR1971Kant266; AIR1971Mys266; (1971)1MysLJ481
B.S. Pranesh Rao, Adv.
M. Sadanandaswamy, J.1. The appellant is the judgment-debtor and the respondent is the decree-holder. The respondent obtained a money decree on 17-7-1954 for Its. 7,931.25 in O. S. No. 65 of 1954 on the file of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH. Mohamed Khan and ors. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.
Karnataka
Mar-16-1982
Company
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126
B.S. Pramesha Rao, Adv.
Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the legal representatives of the original defendant No. 3, challenging the judgment and decree dated March 22, 1974, made against them in O.S. No. 86 of 1969...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
H. Mohamed Khan and ors. Vs. Andhara Bank Ltd. and ors.
Karnataka
Jul-16-1982
CommercialContract
Indian Contact Act, 1872 - Sections 126; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 13
AIR1983Kant73; [1985]57CompCas618(Kar); ILR1983KAR252
B.S. Pramesha Rao and ;M.S. Bhujenga Rao, Advs.
Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the legal representatives of the original defendant-3 challenging the judgment and decree dated March 22, 1974, made against them in O.S.No.86 of 1969 by the Second Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPaidi Lakshmayya Vs. Indian Bank
Karnataka
Jan-27-1982
Company
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70
[1984]56CompCas281(Kar)
B.S. Pranesh Rao, Adv.
Venkatesh, J. 1. Appellant, Shri Paidi Lakshmayya, who has been unsuccessful in his defence both in the courts of the Civil Judge and District Judge, Bellary, against the claim of the respondent, Indian Bank Limited (Bank),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPaidi Lakshmayya Vs. Indian Bank Ltd.
Karnataka
Jan-27-1982
CommercialContract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70
AIR1982Kant338; [1984]56CompCas59(Kar); ILR1982KAR565; 1982(1)KarLJ345
B.S. Pranesh Rao, Adv. for ;S. Mani, Adv.
1. Appellant Sri Paidi Lakshmayya, who has been unsuccessful in his defence both in the Courts of the Civil Judge and District Judge, Bellary, against the claim of the respondent, Indian Bank Limited (Bank), has preferred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKuvarp Industries and anr. Vs. State Bank of Mysore
Karnataka
Aug-01-1984
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rules 1, 5 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Order 9, Rules 6 and 13 - Order 17, Rules 2 and 3 - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1
AIR1985Kant77a; ILR1984KAR1086
Pranesh Rao, Adv. for ;S. Mani, Adv.
1. This is a Miscellaneous First Appeal by the defendants against the order D/- 16-10-1981 passed by the 13th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, in Misc. No. 407/81 dismissing the petition filed under O. 9,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Through Amruthur Police. Vs. Gangaiah @ Raja @ Palli and ors
Karnataka
Nov-04-2010
Criminal
Sri.G.S.Balagangadhar, Adv.
1. This appeal is filed challenging the judgment dated 18.10.2004 passed by the III Addl. Sessions Judge, Tumkur District in S.C.No.27/2002 acquitting the respondents of the offence U/s 143. 147. 148 and 302 r/w Section 149...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›