Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: pranesh rao · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 30 1991

Lt. Cdr. M.C. Kendall Vs. S. Chandrasekhar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-30-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 20

Reported in : ILR1991KAR4142; 1992(1)KarLJ604

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Subbaramaiah, Adv. for R-1 and ;B.S. Pranesh Rao, Adv. for R-3

N.D.V. Bhat, J. 1. This Appeal is preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 13-8-1981 passed by the Principal Civil Judge, Bangalore District, Bangalore in O.S.No. 61/1980.2. The facts relevant for the disposal of this appeal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1971

K. Muniswamappa Vs. P. Chennakrishnappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-13-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 48

Reported in : AIR1971Kant266; AIR1971Mys266; (1971)1MysLJ481

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Pranesh Rao, Adv.

M. Sadanandaswamy, J.1. The appellant is the judgment-debtor and the respondent is the decree-holder. The respondent obtained a money decree on 17-7-1954 for Its. 7,931.25 in O. S. No. 65 of 1954 on the file of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1982

H. Mohamed Khan and ors. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-16-1982

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Pramesha Rao, Adv.

Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the legal representatives of the original defendant No. 3, challenging the judgment and decree dated March 22, 1974, made against them in O.S. No. 86 of 1969...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 16 1982

H. Mohamed Khan and ors. Vs. Andhara Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-16-1982

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Indian Contact Act, 1872 - Sections 126; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR1983Kant73; [1985]57CompCas618(Kar); ILR1983KAR252

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Pramesha Rao and ;M.S. Bhujenga Rao, Advs.

Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the legal representatives of the original defendant-3 challenging the judgment and decree dated March 22, 1974, made against them in O.S.No.86 of 1969 by the Second Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 1982

Paidi Lakshmayya Vs. Indian Bank

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-27-1982

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70

Reported in : [1984]56CompCas281(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Pranesh Rao, Adv.

Venkatesh, J. 1. Appellant, Shri Paidi Lakshmayya, who has been unsuccessful in his defence both in the courts of the Civil Judge and District Judge, Bellary, against the claim of the respondent, Indian Bank Limited (Bank),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 1982

Paidi Lakshmayya Vs. Indian Bank Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-27-1982

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70

Reported in : AIR1982Kant338; [1984]56CompCas59(Kar); ILR1982KAR565; 1982(1)KarLJ345

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Pranesh Rao, Adv. for ;S. Mani, Adv.

1. Appellant Sri Paidi Lakshmayya, who has been unsuccessful in his defence both in the Courts of the Civil Judge and District Judge, Bellary, against the claim of the respondent, Indian Bank Limited (Bank), has preferred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1984

Kuvarp Industries and anr. Vs. State Bank of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-01-1984

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rules 1, 5 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Order 9, Rules 6 and 13 - Order 17, Rules 2 and 3 - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1985Kant77a; ILR1984KAR1086

Advocate for Respondent : Pranesh Rao, Adv. for ;S. Mani, Adv.

1. This is a Miscellaneous First Appeal by the defendants against the order D/- 16-10-1981 passed by the 13th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, in Misc. No. 407/81 dismissing the petition filed under O. 9,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2010

State Through Amruthur Police. Vs. Gangaiah @ Raja @ Palli and ors

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-04-2010

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Sri.G.S.Balagangadhar, Adv.

1. This appeal is filed challenging the judgment dated 18.10.2004 passed by the III Addl. Sessions Judge, Tumkur District in S.C.No.27/2002 acquitting the respondents of the offence U/s 143. 147. 148 and 302 r/w Section 149...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial