Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Pam Developments Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 34

Reported in : 2004(2)ARBLR480(Cal),2004(1)CHN407

Advocate for Respondent : Pranab Kumar Ray, ;Promit Roy and ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta, Advs.

1. This is an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the 'said Act' in short) for setting aside of the award made and published on January 25, 2002 by Mr. Satyabrata...

Pranab Kumar Ray and Another Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionFERA

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226;; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8 and 9;; Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 24(1)

Reported in : AIR1993Cal50,(1993)1CALLT69(HC),97CWN330,1994(48)ECC152

Advocate for Respondent : Subrata Roy Chowdhury, ;Dr. Tapas Banerjee, ;A. Gupta, S. Ghosh and ;Sibaji Mitra, Advs.

ORDER1. The writ petitioners have challenged the validity of the decision of the Reserve Bank of India as communicated by letter dated 13th January, 1990 rejecting the request of the petitioner No. 1 to releaseforeign exchange...

Naffar Chandra Jute Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Assistant Collector of ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 3 and 8(1); ;Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1993)2CALLT79(HC),1993(66)ELT574(Cal)

Ruma Pal, J.1. The petitioners carry on business of manufacturing jute. The question involved in this writ petition is whether jute bags with polythene liner are entitled to the benefit of Modification No. 65/87-C.E. dated 1.3.87...

Rajinder Tiku vs.pragati Power Corporation Limited & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :6. h September, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11144/2015 & CM No.28945/2015 % 1. RAJINDER TIKU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv....