Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: pramod kumar · Page 1 of about 2,168 results (0.478 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 16 2008

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ballu Alias Vinod Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-16-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008(3)MPHT479

Abhay M. Naik, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh (appellant) against acquittal of accused/respondent from the charge under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.2. According to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2014

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ashwita Arvind Poll and O ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Dec-16-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Afonso, Mr. Singbal

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 26.09.2008, passed by the learned Presiding Officer of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mapusa (M.A.C.T., for short),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2006

Jas Rath Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-27-2006

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 11, 18, 19, 23, 23(1A), 24, 25, 36, 51A and 54; Delhi Land Reforms Act; Improvement Act; Delhi Development Act; Registration Act - Sections 57(5); Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 41, Rules 23 and 27

Reported in : 130(2006)DLT700

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Poddar, Adv. for LAC and ; Gaurav Sarin, Adv. for DDA in RFA Nos. 144/1988, 183/1990, 751/94, 19

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 7th September, 2005 remitted the above appeals to this Court with the following directions :-Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, we are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 15 2008

Syed Md. Akhtar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through C.B.i. and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-15-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR734(Jhr)]

ORDERR.R. Prasad, J.1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing for the C.B.I.2. This application has been filed under Section 482, Cr PC for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of case bearing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2004

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]92ITD120(Delhi)

ORDERSinghal, JM Various issues are involved in this appeal. However, for the sake of convenience, we shall first take up some legal issues.2. First such issue relates to various disallowances under section 43B aggregating Rs. 230,73,57,062...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1985

State of Orissa Vs. Bishnu Charan Muduli

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-10-1985

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1573

B.K. Behera, J.1. The appellants Bishu Charan Muduli, Rabindranath Swain, Pramod Kumar Barik, Suru Kama and Amrutlal Banchor stood charged with the co-accused Govinda Naik under Section 120B of the Penal Code (for short, 'the Code')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

Chandi Prasad and Others Vs. Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Hapur ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-30-2001

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1313

Advocate for Respondent : Pramod Kumar Jain, S.C.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 22.11.2000 whereby the appellate court held that the execution application filed by the contesting respondents was within time.2. Briefly stated the facts are that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2016

Datta Education Society, Talne Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through it ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Aug-23-2016

Subject : Education

S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, and heard finally with the consent of the parties. 2. This Petition takes exception to the impugned order dated 11.09.2014 passed by respondent no.3 Deputy Director...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1995

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Jagat NaraIn Chandu Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-10-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A and 256

Reported in : (1996)133CTR(All)484; [1996]217ITR491(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Pramod Kumar Jain, Adv.

1. Heard Sri Shekhar Srivastava, learned counsel for the Revenue-applicant, and Sri Pramod Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee.2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the opinion that the following...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2006

Amit Jogi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : May-03-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120A, 120B, 193, 218, 259, 302, 307, 324, 427 and 447; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 313, 437 and 439

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3349

Advocate for Respondent : Pramod Kumar Verma, Addl. Adv. General,; Utkarsh Verma, Dy. GA. and;

ORDERS.R. Nayak, C.J.1. This is an application for bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code'). This is the second bail application filed by the applicant herein in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial