Advanced Search Results
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ballu Alias Vinod Kumar
Madhya Pradesh
May-16-2008
Criminal
2008(3)MPHT479
Abhay M. Naik, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh (appellant) against acquittal of accused/respondent from the charge under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.2. According to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ashwita Arvind Poll and O ...
Mumbai Goa
Dec-16-2014
Land Acquisition
Mr. Afonso, Mr. Singbal
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 26.09.2008, passed by the learned Presiding Officer of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mapusa (M.A.C.T., for short),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJas Rath Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Apr-27-2006
PropertyCivil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 11, 18, 19, 23, 23(1A), 24, 25, 36, 51A and 54; Delhi Land Reforms Act; Improvement Act; Delhi Development Act; Registration Act - Sections 57(5); Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 41, Rules 23 and 27
130(2006)DLT700
Sanjay Poddar, Adv. for LAC and ; Gaurav Sarin, Adv. for DDA in RFA Nos. 144/1988, 183/1990, 751/94, 19
Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 7th September, 2005 remitted the above appeals to this Court with the following directions :-Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, we are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Syed Md. Akhtar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through C.B.i. and anr.
Jharkhand
Apr-15-2008
Criminal
[2008(2)JCR734(Jhr)]
ORDERR.R. Prasad, J.1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing for the C.B.I.2. This application has been filed under Section 482, Cr PC for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of case bearing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Delhi
Oct-11-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]92ITD120(Delhi)
ORDERSinghal, JM Various issues are involved in this appeal. However, for the sake of convenience, we shall first take up some legal issues.2. First such issue relates to various disallowances under section 43B aggregating Rs. 230,73,57,062...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Orissa Vs. Bishnu Charan Muduli
Orissa
May-10-1985
Criminal
1985CriLJ1573
B.K. Behera, J.1. The appellants Bishu Charan Muduli, Rabindranath Swain, Pramod Kumar Barik, Suru Kama and Amrutlal Banchor stood charged with the co-accused Govinda Naik under Section 120B of the Penal Code (for short, 'the Code')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandi Prasad and Others Vs. Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Hapur ...
Allahabad
Mar-30-2001
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136
2001(2)AWC1313
Pramod Kumar Jain, S.C.
Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 22.11.2000 whereby the appellate court held that the execution application filed by the contesting respondents was within time.2. Briefly stated the facts are that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDatta Education Society, Talne Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through it ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Aug-23-2016
Education
S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, and heard finally with the consent of the parties. 2. This Petition takes exception to the impugned order dated 11.09.2014 passed by respondent no.3 Deputy Director...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Jagat NaraIn Chandu Lal
Allahabad
Jul-10-1995
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A and 256
(1996)133CTR(All)484; [1996]217ITR491(All)
Pramod Kumar Jain, Adv.
1. Heard Sri Shekhar Srivastava, learned counsel for the Revenue-applicant, and Sri Pramod Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee.2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the opinion that the following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmit Jogi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.
Chhattisgarh
May-03-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120A, 120B, 193, 218, 259, 302, 307, 324, 427 and 447; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 313, 437 and 439
2006CriLJ3349
Pramod Kumar Verma, Addl. Adv. General,; Utkarsh Verma, Dy. GA. and;
ORDERS.R. Nayak, C.J.1. This is an application for bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code'). This is the second bail application filed by the applicant herein in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »