Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: prakash verma · Page 1 of about 187 results (0.147 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 07 2005

Om Prakash Verma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-07-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulations 2, 3, 3(1) and 3(2); Uttar Pradesh High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries to Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971; University Grant Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC774

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

V.K. Shukla, J.1. Brief facts giving rise to present writ petition is that in the district of Moradabad, there is a recognized institution known as Lal Bahadur Shastri Smarak Inter College, Sultanpurdost, Thakurdwara, Disrict Moradabad. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2001

State of M.P. Vs. Ashish Batham

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-10-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 449; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 105 and 106; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 368

Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT272

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Verma, Govt. Adv.

J.G. Chitre, J.1. Both these matters are being decided by this common judgment and order because the Death Reference and the said appeal are arising out of the same incident. Learned Sessions Judge, Shajapur after passing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1998

Salim Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-24-1998

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 215; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4

Reported in : I(1999)DMC701

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Verma, Dy. G.A.

J.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioner is hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and legality of the order of conviction and sentence passed against him by the Trial Court convicting for an offence under Section 4 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 03 1998

Rameshchandra Babulalji Shrivastav Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-03-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 389 and 397; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 53 and 409

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ571

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Verma, Dy. Government Adv.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Heard Shri Jaishingh, counsel for the petitioner and Shri Prakash Verma, Dy. G. A. for respondent.The small point is to be decided in this revision petition and, therefore, on the request of counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2000

Akram and Another Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-07-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Crimal Procedure, 1974 - Sections 205 and 397; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 66, 392, 397(1), 397(2) and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323 and 506(1); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 192(A); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 204(2) and 206

Reported in : I(2000)ACC614; 2000CriLJ3520; 2001(1)MPHT3

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Prakash Verma, Dy G.A.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. The question to be adjudicated is 'whether the Magistrate trying the cases of petty nature should grant exemption to the accused who has been represented by an advocate or counsel, and wants to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1999

Kamal Kishore Vs. Janpad Panchayat, Nalkheda and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-18-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR2000MP225; 2000(1)MPHT212; 1999(2)MPLJ471

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Verma, Dy. Govt. Adv.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Shri Chaphekar counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the action taken by the respondents against the petitioner is not only inconsistent with the provisions of law but destructive to the benevolent object...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2000

Smt. Sakinabai and Others Vs. State of M.P. and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-19-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1) and (6), 154, 162 and 246

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT445

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Prakash Verma, Govt. Adv.

ORDERN.K. Jain, J.1. All these petitions have been heard as connected matters and are being disposed of by this common order.2. In all these petitions, the petitioners who are arm dealers, call in question the State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2003

Manoj Surgical Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-2003

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Companies Act, 1956; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; ;Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 12; ;Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 2; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956- Sections 8

Reported in : [2006]143STC101(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Verma, Government Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. 1. By filing this writ, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks quashing of an order, dated September 30, 2002 (annexure P-1), passed by State (State Level...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2001

Rajani Extractions Limited and anr. Vs. Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-24-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 16 and 16B

Reported in : [2001]123STC469(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Verma, Government Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The challenge in this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is essentially to the order (annexure P12). In substance, by this order and the orders passed earlier...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1999

Krishna Bhagwan Agarwal and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 225, 226 and 227; Indian Partnership Act - Sections 43

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1753

Advocate for Respondent : Ajit Kumar, Adv. and;S. C.

O. P. Garg, J.1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India involves the determination of the validity justification. correctness and propriety of the order of appointment of receiver under the provisions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial