Advanced Search Results

Amrutbhai Bholibhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2000)3GLR787

Advocate for Respondent : A.D. Oza, PP for Respondent No. 1,; Haroobhai Mehta, Sr. Adv. and;

A.M. Kapadia, J.1. In this petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner against whom C.R. No. I-38 of 2000 is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of...

Nathia Devi vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate, Ms. Wanika Trehan, Ms. Gari P. Desai, Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Advocates. ........ Petitioner NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC for NDMC. Mr....

ito Vs. Rajpal Singh

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)91TTJ(Mumbai)993

ORDERJAIDEV, A.M.:These cross-appeals are directed against Commissioner (Appeals)'s order dated 1-10-1996.ITA No. 260/Mum/1997 : (Revenue's appeal) :2. The following ground of appeal has been raised'On the facts and in law, the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-XXX, Mumbai, has...

Raj Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 55(1994)DLT679

Jaspal Singh, J.(1) What is the theory of social contract as fund, say. in Locke, Rousseau and Kant? Or the classical doctrine of utilitarianism as formulated by Bentham and Sidgwick and the utilitarian economists Edge worth...

Sajal Sureshkumar JaIn Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66(1), 66(1)(6) and 85(1)(3); Evidence Act - Sections 32 and 165; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 389; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 323, 324, 328, 342, 328 and 376(2)

Reported in : 2010CriLJ213

Advocate for Respondent : Sunit S. Shah, P.P.,; M.R. Mengdey, Adv. and; Dipen Desa

ORDER1. As in all the applications for bail pending the appeals, common questions arise for consideration as the appeals are also arising from the common Judgment and order of the learned Sessions Judge, they are being...

Abdul Hamid Vs. Bora Tataya and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Orissa Tenancy Act, 1913 - Sections 236; Orissa Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1946 - Sections 3 and 4; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 117

Reported in : AIR1951Ori153

Advocate for Respondent : N. Mukherji, Adv.

Jagannadhadas, J.1. Defendant 1 is the applt in this 2nd appeal. The appeal arises out of a suit for ejectment filed by the pltf against defts 1 and; 2 in respect of a homestead land, .015...

Commissioner of Gift Tax Vs. Executors and Trustees of the Estate of L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Section 6

Reported in : AIR1988SC522; (1988)67CTR(SC)247; [1988]170ITR144(SC); JT1988(1)SC46; 1988(1)SCALE6; 1988Supp(1)SCC115; [1988]2SCR341

M.N. VENKATACHALIAH, J.1. This appeal, by certificate, by the Commissioner of Gift Tax, Gujarat directed against the order dated October 10, 1974 of the Gujarat High Court in Gift Tax Ref. No. 1 of 1973 raises...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sps Dhinda N.M.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act - Section 71

Reported in : (2002)10SCC106

K.T. Thomas and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.Leave granted in SLP (Civil) No. 18889 of 1998.Applications for restoration/intervention are dismissed as withdrawn.In all these matters when the arguments proceeded, the main point emphasised is this :Whether the Court...

M.S. Aggarwal Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Del)692

ORDERT.N. Chopra, A.M.This appeal is filed by the assessed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 2-1-2003 whereby block assessment made by the assessing officer under section 158BC has been upheld.2. The block period involved...

Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association Represented by Its Treasurer ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Rule. 2. The Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3. By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are claiming...