Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: piyush shukla · Page 1 of about 31 results (0.041 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 14 2006

Rajesh Singh Son of Shri Ram Kishore Singh Vs. Labour Court,

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-14-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Dispute Act - Sections 6N and 6P; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3661; [2006(111)FLR89]

Advocate for Respondent : Piyush Shukla and ;Hira Lal Yadav, Advs. and ;S.C.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the award dated 22,06.2002 of the Prescribed Authority, Labour Court, Allahabad on a reference...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2000

Dr. Jagdamba Singh and Others Vs. Vice-chancellor, University of Allah ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-17-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for SCs, STs and OBCs) Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1) and (5), 15 and 15(3); Constitution of India - Articles 30 and 141; Uttar Pradesh State of Universities Act, 1971

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1696; (2000)2UPLBEC1822

Advocate for Respondent : R. G. Padia, ;Prakash Padia, ;L.P. Naithani and ;Piyush Shukla, Advs.

D.R. Chaudhary, J.1. These two writ petitions involve common questions of law and facts and can be decided by a common judgment and as such the same are being taken up together.2. By means of advertisement...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2004

Jagannath and ors. Vs. Additional Commissioner and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-2004

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 4

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3012; (2004)2UPLBEC1924

Advocate for Respondent : Piyush Shukla, ;Nahood A. Moonis, ;Murtaza Ali and ;V.K. Shukla, Advs. and S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Sankatha Rai, learned Counsel for the applicant-petitioners, Ms. Nahood A. Moonis, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 3, 5, 6 and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 18 2004

Notified Area Vs. Third Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-18-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 233; Uttar Pradesh Urban Areas Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1957 - Sections 84; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR2004All371; 2004(4)AWC3170

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Singh, ;V.K. Singh and ;S.N. Singh, Advs. and ;Piyush Shukla, S.C.

ORDERArun Tandon, J.1. Heard Mr. Shakti Swarup Nigam, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri V.K. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 7 and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2004

Hina Negi (Km.) Vs. the Registrar, C.P.M.T. 2004 (Uttar Pradesh) Chaud ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 6A

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC667; (2005)1UPLBEC432

Advocate for Respondent : Anurag Khanna, ;M.P. Singh, ;Piyush Shukla, Advs. and ;S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri R.J. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anurag Khanna, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1, Sri M.P. Singh, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 4, and Sri Piyush Shukla,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2004

Rajni Sharma (Smt.) Vs. Committee of Management of Church City Junior ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-09-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Recognised Basic School (Junior High School) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978 - Rules 4 and 20

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC405

Advocate for Respondent : Piyush Shukla, Adv. and ;S.C.

Arun Tandon, J. 1. Heard Sri Devendra Dahma, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. It is not necessary to issue notice to the respondent No. 1 or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2004

Lalit Mohan Agrawal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-01-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC737

Advocate for Respondent : Piyush Shukla, S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Diwakar Rai Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. It is not necessary to call for counter affidavit in view of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2004

Committee of Management, Sri Rameshwar Prasad Balika Higher Secondary ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-25-2004

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Intermediate Education Act - Sections 6A(7)

Reported in : (2005)2UPLBEC1220

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhakar Pandey, Adv. and ;Piyush Shukla, S.C.

Arun Tandon, J. 1. Heard Sri D.S.M. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri Sudhakar Pandey, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 5 and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.2. Sri Rameshwar Prasad...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2004

Ashok Kumar and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-10-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh X-ray Technicians Service Rules, 1986

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC143

Advocate for Respondent : Piyush Shukla, S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. Petitioners, who are four in number were initially appointed as Dark Room Assistants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2004

Raghubar Dayal Vs. Commissioner, Kanpur Division and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-06-2004

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesConstitution

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 3, 3(2), 12, 12D, 12D(1) and 12D(2); Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act; Companies Act; Trade Marks Act

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2230; 2005(1)ESC204

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Khare, ;K.G. Khare and ;A.K. Dixit, Advs. and ;Piyush Shukla, S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Vishnu Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri A.K. Dixit, Sri K.G. Khare, learned Counsel for the Respondent. No. 4 and Sir Piyush Shukla,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial