Advanced Search Results

Shitla Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Nyayik Sewa Niyamawali, 1951 - Rules 15 and 19

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1106

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Sirohi and ;Pushpendra Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

A.K. Yog, J.1. Heard learned Counsels for the parties at length and perused the orchard.2. U.P. Public Service Commission/Respondent No. 3 placed its original record + original marks competitive sheets in sealed cover and we perused...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Brijnandan Prasad and Sons

Court : Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31) and 4

Advocate for Respondent : Pawan Kumar, Adv.

1. This reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is at the instance of the Revenue. The question of law referred to this court for its opinion runs as follows : ' Whether, on...

Prem Singh @ Fauzi Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 428

Reported in : 2007(96)DRJ635

Advocate for Respondent : Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. Criminal Appeal Nos.391 of 2005 and 774 of 2005 seek to challenge a common judgment delivered by Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 9 of 2001 arising out of F.I.R. No....

Munna Lal Vs. Sadhu Ram and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2009)155PLR696

Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.1. This is defendants revision petition challenging the order dated 31.1.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul, whereby application for leading additional evidence filed by respondent/plaintiff Nos. 1 to 3 has...

Vije Kumar and ors. Vs. Vaibhav Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2009)3PLR40

ORDER1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 13th March, 2008 passed by the learned single judge of this Court in W.P. (Crl.) No. 328 of 2008.2. The writ petition was filed by Vaibhav Gupta...

M. Suryanarayana and ors. Vs. Stiles India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 433(2), 434(1), 439, 483, 529A, 530, 530(1) and 630; Land Reform (frustrated Contracts) Act, 1943; Debtors Act, 1869 - Sections 3(1) and 13

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD185

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Raju and ;P.V. Rama Raju, Advs.

S.R. Nayak, J.1. O.S.A.NO. 5 of 1998 is directed against the Judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge dated 12.8.1997 passed in C.P. No. 71 of 1996 dismissing the company petition filed by the...

Mr. M. Suryanarayana Vs. Stiles India Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Di ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Letters Patent Act - Sections 483; ;Companies Act - Sections 434(1)

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas448(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Raju, Adv. in OSA. No. 5 of 1998 and ;D. Venkata Subbaiah, Adv. in C.P. Nos. 165 & 166/99

ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. O.S.A. No. 5 of 1998 is directed against the Judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge dated 12.8.1997 passed in C.P. No. 71 of 1996 dismissing the company petition filed by...

Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rajhans Steel Ltd.

Court : Patna

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 520; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985

G.S. Chaube, J. 1. This company-petition under Sections 433(e), 434(1)(a) and 439(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') has been presentedfor winding up of Rajhans Steel Ltd., a public limited company incorporated under the Act,...

Magadh Stock Exchange Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD, 269UD(1), 269UE, 269UF, 269UG, 269UG(1) and 269UH

Advocate for Respondent : L.N. Rastogi, S.K. Sharan, Advs. for respondents Nos. 1 to 3, Pawan Kumar , Senior Adv., Lakshmikant Tewary, Raj Kishore Prasad, Anil Chowdhary and Roy Choudhary, Advs. for respondent No. 4

G.B. Patnaik, C.J. 1. The order passed by the Appropriate Authority dated January 25, 1990, under Section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), is the subject-matter of challenge in C.W.J.C....

Baijnath Prasad and ors. Vs. Jaimangal Limited and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 441(2), 443(1), 529 and 529A; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 46B; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1985; Income Tax Act

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Kumar Tiwary and Umesh Prasad Singh, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Pawan Kumar, Kali Kant Jha, Arun Kumar and Tej Bahadur Roy, Advs. for respondent No. 3 and Ajay Kumar Sinha, Adv. for respo

S.N. Jha, J. 1. Jaimangal Limited, the company in question, was wound up by order dated December 5, 1997. The official liquidator was appointed as the liquidator of the company and directed to take charge of...