Advanced Search Results
The State of Maharashtra Through Manikpur Police Station Vs. Dilip Pre ...
Mumbai
Nov-01-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 149, 302, 307, 376, 376(2) 380 and 452 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 235(2), 354(3) and 428; Evidence Act - Sections 118
(2007)109BOMLR2453
Ramakant Patil Sr.Counsel , ;Shivraj Patil, Adv. for Respondent-Accused No. 1 in Confirmation Case No. 2/2007 (and for Appellant No. 1 in Appeal No. 1086/2006), ;S.N. Raj and ;S.L. Shukla, Advs.
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The above confirmation case has been filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking confirmation of death penalty imposed upon the original Accused Nos.1 to 3 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, by his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavi Chabiram Sharma Vs. R.H. Mendonca, Commissioner of Police and Oth ...
Mumbai
Dec-21-1998
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5-A; Constitution of India - Article 22(5) and 226
1999(5)BomCR271; 1999BomCR(Cri)271; 1999CriLJ2960; 1999(1)MhLj839
Shri. Rajiv Patil
ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. Through filing this writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-the detenu himself -has challenged the order of detention passed by the first respondent Mr. R.H. Mendonca,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Limited Through Its Chief Offic ...
Mumbai
Jun-02-2008
SICA
Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73G, 79A, 91, 101, 102, 102(1), 102(2), 103, 103(4), 104, 105, 105(1), 107, 154 and 246(1); Securatization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 13, 13(2), 13(4), 13(9), 13(13), 17(2), 31, 31B, 34, 35 and 37; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 2(1) and 5; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 47; Transfer of Properties Act - Sections 59; Specific Reliefs Act - Sections 20; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172 and 176; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 529A and 529(1); Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; Debt Recovery Act; Guj
2008(4)BomCR719
N.B. Khandare, Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 1 to 3, ;Dilip Bankar Patil, Adv. for Respondent No. 5, ;P.R. Patil, Adv. for Respondent No. 6, ;V.D. Salunke, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 7 to 11, ;B.L. S
N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. All ten writ petitions, together with four surviving civil applications therein, are being considered together, for disposal. Common factor in all these matters, is Godavari Dudhna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. at and post...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Kishore B. Dave Vs. Dean, J.J. Group of Hospitals and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-09-1986
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25B(1) and 25F
[1986(52)FLR380]; (1994)IIILLJ1001Bom
B.E. Patil, Asst. Government Pleader
S.P. Bharucha, J.1. The petitioner was employed on 20th May 1976 by the Dean of the J.J. Group of Hospitals to work in its Neurology Department for a period of 28 days. On 9th July 1976...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation Through Municipal Commissioner Vs. Shankar S/O H ...
Mumbai
Jul-23-1985
Criminal
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 43, 52, 53, 54, 142 and 152; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468
1986(2)BomCR38
V.B. Patil, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;C.G. Solshe, Adv. (appointed by the Court) for respondent No. 1
Sharad Manohar, J.1. Quite an important question relating to the interpretation and functioning of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act 1966, (hereinafter referred to as 'The Town Planning Act'), arises for consideration in this appeal.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShahnaz Javed Abdul Aziz Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-28-2002
Criminal
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 112; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 489(B) and 489(C); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226
2002BomCR(Cri)853; 2002CriLJ2242
B.R. Patil, Acting Public Prosecutor
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who describes herself as the wife of the detenu - Javed Abdul Aziz Shaikh alias Javed Munnlruddin Shaikh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYellappa and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-03-2004
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 243T and 245D; Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 42(2A)
ILR2004KAR3966; 2004(7)KarLJ449
Jayakumar S. Patil, Sr. Adv. for R5 and ;H.B. Narayan, HCGP for R1 to 3
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J. 1. Though the matter is listed for orders on I.As I and II, with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties it is taken for final disposal and disposed of as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.B. Dhanaraju Vs. Cauvery GramIn Bank, Mysore and anr.
Karnataka
Oct-05-2001
Service
Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - Sections 30; Cauvery Grameena Bank Staff (Service) Regulations, 1980 - Regulations 17, 19, 30, 30(2) and 30(3); Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 148-A; Evidence Act
2002(1)KarLJ250
Ashok B. Patil, Adv.
ORDERThe Court 1. Petitioner, an employee of the first respondent-Cauvery Grameena Bank ('Bank' for short), a body constituted under Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, is before this Court, inter alia questioning the legality or otherwise of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Malharrao Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-10-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471
1997(2)MhLj163
Shri K.G. Patil, Addl. Public Prosecutor
ORDER1. In these four criminal applications, the question involved is identical. They arise out of a common order made on 4-12-1996 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, F. C. Ambad, in Criminal Cases Nos. 23 to 26...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. TexspIn Engg. and Mfg. Works
Mumbai
Mar-05-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(47), 32, 34, 34(2), 43(6), 45, 45(1), 45(4) and 48 ; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 575
(2003)180CTR(Bom)497; [2003]263ITR345(Bom); [2003]44SCL239(Bom)
V.H. Patil, ;V.B. Joshi and ;Jyoti Dialani, Advs.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal dated 11-12-2000 in Appeal No. 5814/Bom/99, the Department has come by way of appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »