Advanced Search Results

Praveen Mittal Vs. Department of Environment, Govt. of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 5; Delhi Plastic Bag (Manufacture, Sales and Usage) and Non-biodegradable Garbage (Control) Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Bio Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998

Reported in : 162(2009)DLT365

Advocate for Respondent : Parag P. Tripathi, ASG, ; Ruchi Sindhwani, ; Aakanksha Shar

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the clarification issued by the Department of Environment, Government of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi on 20.02.2009, with regard to the use of non-woven bags. The...

Molar Mal (Dead) Through L.Rs. Vs. M/S. Kay Iron Works(P) Ltd. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 13(3) and 15(6); Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR2000SC1261; JT2000(3)SC122a; (2000)125PLR678; 2000(2)SCALE334; (2000)4SCC285

ORDER1. Respondent-landlord had filed an eviction petition before the Court of Rent Controller, Jagadhri in the year 1979 seeking eviction of the appellant herein from the petition scheduled land situated on Jagadhri Road, Yamuna Nagar under...

S.K.N. Associates Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 153 and 166; Indian Standard Institution (Certification Marks) Act, 1952 - Sections 15, 15(1) and 16; Bureau of Indian Standards Certification Regulations, 1988 - Regulation 5(5)(c); Lequeefide Gas (Regulation of Supply and Distribution) Order, 1988; Lequeefide Gas (Regulation of Supply and Distribution) Order, 1993; Lequeefide Gas (Regulation of Supply and Distribution) Order, 2000; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(98)DRJ43

Advocate for Respondent : Gaurav Duggal, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ; Vikas Singh, ASG and ;

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the deletion contained in the 14th Endorsement to the petitioner No. 1's certification marks license No. CM/L-2341642 for IS: 9798: 1995 which seeks to delete 'single...

Manish Mohan Sharma and ors. Vs. Ram Bahadur Thakur and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCompany

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4

Advocate for Respondent : Chitranjan Sinha and Basudeo Prasad, Advs.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J.1. Appellants have preferred this appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, aggrieved by the order, dated December 22, 2002, passed by the Principal Bench of the Company Law Board, New Delhi,...

Bu and Cu Block Residents Welfare Association and ors. Vs. Dda and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Development Act - 11A

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi165

ORDERArun Kumar, J.1. Civil Writ Petition No. 6666 of 1999 has been filed by BU-Block Residents Welfare Association and 18 other residents by way of Public Interest Litigation. 2. There is a plot measuring 2.5 acres...

Colgate Palmolive Co. Limited and anr. Vs. Mr. Patel and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 141; General Clauses Act, 1987; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 2(1), 10, 10(1), 17, 18(4) and 19; Trademarks Act, 1999 - Sections 10, 17, 17(1), 100, 159(1), 159(2) and 159(4)

Reported in : 2005(31)PTC583(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. and ; Pratibha M. Singh, Adv.

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. A chromatic monopoly in respect of red and white colours claimed by the plaintiff by virtue of the registration of its mark is the issue which arises in this application for interim relief...

M.D., Ramakrishna Poultry P. Ltd. Vs. R. Chellappan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1), 17 and 17(3); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 51; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 164

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC169; 2009(7)SCALE157

Advocate for Respondent : Parag Tripathi, ; A.T.M. Ranga Ramanujam, Sr. Advs., ; V. Pr

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is a Private Limited Company engaged in the business of poultry farming which is confined to the production of eggs. It has constructed three separate sheds on Survey Nos....

Balkrishna Ramkaran Goyal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Partnership Act, 1932

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi351; 2005(1)CTLJ197(Del); 117(2005)DLT338; 2005(80)DRJ268

Advocate for Respondent : Parag Tripathi and ; Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advs. and ; Sachin

D.K. Jain, J.1. Rule D.B.2. Having regard to the urgency of the matters, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these have been taken up for final disposal at this stage itself.3. The issue...

Patel Engineering Ltd. and anr. Vs. National Highways Authority of Ind ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi298; 2005(1)CTLJ377(Del); 118(2005)DLT623; 2005(80)DRJ458

Advocate for Respondent : A.M. Singhvi and ; Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs., ; Ravi Kini

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. In these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, appropriate directions have been sought against the National Highway Authority of India (a statutory body, hereafter called 'NHAI'); the petitioners seek directions to...

Kangaro Industries (Retd.) and ors. Vs. Jaininder JaIn and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : New Arbitration Act - Sections 8; Contempt of Courts Act, 1979 - Sections 11 and 12; Specific Relief Act, 1887 - Sections 36, 37, 38, 41 and 56; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1963; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2 and 151 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Constitution of India - Articles 129, 141, 142, 245(1) and 245(2)

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC321(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Parag Tripathi and ; Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Advs. and ; Shailen

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This appeal challenges the order of the learned Single Judge dated 18th October, 2006. The learned Single Judge had prefaced the impugned order with the following paragraph:At loggerheads, in these proceedings, are the...