Advanced Search Results
State of West Bengal Etc. Vs. Mir Fakir Mohammad Etc.
Kolkata
Apr-04-1977
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 38 and 97(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100A; ;Calcutta High Court Appellate Side Rules - Rule 2
AIR1977Cal285
Panchanan Pal, Adv. for Opposite Parties in S.A. No. 1658 of 1965, ;S.C. Das Gupta and ;Rebati Nath Sarkar, Advs. for Opposite Parties in S.A. No. 1603 of 1966
R. Bhattacharya, J. 1. These two applications under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, one filed in connexion with the Second Appeal No 1658 of 1965 and another relating to Second Appeal No. 1603 of 1966...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHiru Sepai Vs. Sultan Sepai
Kolkata
Jul-17-1974
Property
West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1956 - Sections 4(1) and 8(1); ;Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Section 26(F)
AIR1975Cal1,79CWN1
Panchanan Pal, ;Amar Nath Dhole, ;Debabrata Nandi, ;Bhudeb Bhattacharjee and ;Jyotsna Das, Advs.
M.M. Dutt, J. 1. This Rule has been referred to a Full Bench by a Division Bench of this Court. The circumstances which induced the learned Judges of the Division Bench 'to refer the Rule to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNishit Kumar Biswas Vs. Sm. Anjali Biswas
Kolkata
May-05-1967
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12(1) and 23; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104
AIR1968Cal105,71CWN831
Panchanan Pal and ;N.C. Kumar, Advs.
Laik, J.1. This appeal, by the petitioner Nishit, whom I will call 'the husband', appears to have been limited to a consideration of the provision of Section 12(1)(d) of the Hindu Marriage Act. 1955, (for short,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dhane Ali Mia and ors. Vs. Sobhan Ali and ors.
Kolkata
Oct-11-1977
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 218, 244, 245, 273 and 283
AIR1978Cal399,(1978)1CompLJ35(Cal),82CWN431
Panchanan Pal and ;Amar Nath Dhole, Advs.
G.N. Ray, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed in O. C. Suit No. 7 of 1959 (Letters of Administration) of the Court of the learned District Judge, Jalpaiguri, wherein an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUmaprasad Pal and ors. Vs. Mrityunjay Pal and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-04-1968
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(10) and 47 - Order 21, Rules 100 and 103
AIR1968Cal547,73CWN4
Panchanan Pal and ;Debabrata Nandy, Advs.
ORDERBijayesh Mukherji, J. 1. This is a rule obtained by the decree-holders in a partition suit, being Title Suit No. 14 of 1962 challenging the order of the munsif qua Executing court under Order 21. Rule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Surajmal JaIn Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-14-1973
Sales Tax
[1973]32STC601(Cal)
Panchanan Pal and ;S.N. Dutt, Advs.
Debiprosad Pal, J.1. The petitioner carries on the business of buying and selling goods under the name and style of Messrs. Padamah Engineering Corporation of which he is the sole proprietor. He is a registered dealer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lahoty Brothers Ltd.
Kolkata
Jan-16-1951
Direct Taxation
Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Section 10(2)
AIR1951Cal149,[1951]19ITR425(Cal)
Binayak Banerjee and ;Panchanan Pal, Advs.
Banerjee, J.1. This is a reference under Section 66(1), Income-Tax Act & the question on which we are to express our opinion is as follows:'Whether on the facts & in the circumstances of this case the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGolam Kibria Molla Vs. Abdur Rouf Molla and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-23-1976
FamilyProperty
Mohammedan Law
AIR1976Cal205
Panchanan Pal and ;Jyotsna Das, Advs.
R. Bhattacharya, J.1. These two second appeals have been directed against the decisions in the first appeals reversing the judgments and the decrees passed in the original suits started by the plaintiff, Golam Kibria Molla.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Paper Products Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxe ...
Kolkata
Jun-21-1973
Sales Tax
[1973]32STC208(Cal)
Panchanan Pal and ;Debesh Mukherjee, Advs.
Debiprosad Pal, J.1. The petitioner is a public limited company and deals in paper containers which are sold mainly to bulk consumers, majority of whom are registered dealers under the Act. The petitioner also is a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Kalpa Kundu Vs. Kasi Nath Dutta and ors.
Kolkata
Nov-17-1949
CivilContract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 and 104 - Order 21, Rules 90 and 92; ; Contract Act, 1872 - Section 55
AIR1950Cal582,54CWN690
Panchanan Pal, Adv.
Sen, J.1. This is a second appeal by one of the decree-holders and it arises in the following circumstances. The appellant obtained a decree and in execution of it put certain property to sale. The sale...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »